Worffan101 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 31, 2018 5:39 am
G-Man, everything you say is in direct defiance of nearly 250 years of American history. Your mindless paranoia is the exact same xenophobic bullshit that got us nonsense like the Chinese Exclusion Act, Jim Crow, and No Irish Need Apply signs.
We had pretty severe immigration restrictions from 1924 to 1965. And the Chinese Exclusion Act itself proves that the U.S. did not have a "take all comers" policy for all of its history.
Worffan101 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 31, 2018 5:39 amImmigrants make us stronger and have built our economy at a shocking pace throughout this country's history, which is how we went from an agrarian backwater in the 1840s to a military powerhouse with a million men under arms 25 years later to the "I Win" button without which the Entente would've lost WW1 45 years after that. My mother's great-grandparents? German immigrants, her family helped build our auto industry in Detroit. My paternal grandmother's mother's side? Scots-Irish immigrants who fought in the Revolution with George Washington. Paternal grandmother's father? F***ing Italians going back to time immemorial, came over and worked in the steel industry in PA. paternal grandfather's side, such a mixed bag of generic white that we don't know where the Hell all of his ancestors came from.
Straw man. You are portraying this as pro-immigrant vs anti-immigrant, whereas the question is whether or not the United States gets to decide whom it wants to let in as immigrants or not.
It's rather like responding to someone who is advocating for "affirmative consent" by talking about what a wonderful thing sex is. It's not anti-sex to demand that people get consent before having sex, and it is not anti-sex to say that you have the right to give consent to some and to deny consent to others (in fact, there really is no point to consent if you are not allowed to withhold it) I notice that when talking about legal vs. illegal immigration, the standard response is "they had to come illegally because they had no legal avenue to get here." That assumes that we have to let in everyone who wants to come, have no right to be selective at all, and I think the problems become clear if you apply the same standards to sexual consent.
Ultimately, the problem with giving birthright citizenship to the children of illegal aliens and tourists is that it strips from the United States the ability to decide whom it wants to bring in. It effectively dismantles our immigration and naturalization screening systems.
Worffan101 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 31, 2018 5:39 amThey all thought of themselves as Americans by the time the first member of the first generation born here grew up.
Great, but the problem is, back then immigrants were expected to accommodate the native-born. We did not have much of a welfare state. Those who failed often wound up going back home. Nowadays everyone is expected to accommodate the newcomers, the government provides for those who can't succeed, and our media and education system are constantly trying to denigrate and castigate the majority ethnic group, promoting resentment and hate in the name of "combatting privilege."
Again, I am not saying that people from anywhere in the world cannot become American, I am saying that it is not automatic, and that giving someone citizenship or having them live in the United States isn not in and of itself enough.
Worffan101 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 31, 2018 5:39 amDo you have any fucking idea how unique that is? We bring people in, we put them in American public schools with American kids of all stripes, they grow up watching our trash TV and eating our shitty fast food and thinking our pop stars are cute and our athletes are cool. They grow up seeing themselves as Americans first and get pissed off when assholes say they're not American because they do XYZ thing different at home, because they're fucking Americans and how dare these assholes who watch the same trash TV and the same shitty fast food criticize them because of what language their parents speak?
I can't help but notice that the actual examples you gave from your own life came here at least a hundred years ago, and yet the general case you are using them to prove is basically from the culture of the last 50 years.
Does everyone think of themselves as Americans first? Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-IL) once said “I have only one loyalty, and that’s to the immigrant community.” (And he is a native-born US citizen from Puerto Rico)
https://www.newsweek.com/pushing-obama- ... form-70093
Again, the issue is not whether or not we can assimilate people, it is whether or not our current immigration policies are working toward that or against it.
Worffan101 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 31, 2018 5:39 amPeople like you are poisoning this country's greatest strength, and it sickens me. The sooner all of you xenophobes pack up and move to Antarctica to build your little Mexicanfrei dystopia, the better, in my opinion. We'll be over here slowly assimilating the world like the Borg and maintaining what is still by far the world's most powerful economy and best military and highest standard of living. And most people around the world will WANT us to assimilate them.
The question is, do they want to adapt to the culture that gives us such a high standard of living, or do they just want to benefit from the standard of living without culturally and socially adapting to the customs that allowed this to happen? Currently the philosophy seems to be, don't adapt at all, we'll accommodate you, and if any of the benefits of the culture elude you, we'll just blame the U.S. for racism and xenophobia, and not consider that certain cultural customs may be necessary for the benefits to exist.
"You say I'm a dreamer/we're two of a kind/looking for some perfect world/we know we'll never find" - Thompson Twins