Cortez marginal tax rate hike
-
- Overlord
- Posts: 6303
- Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2017 1:57 am
Cortez marginal tax rate hike
AOC suggests that people who make over 10 million a year should pay a higher tax rate on that portion of their money, provokes outrage.
"Believe me, there’s nothing so terrible that someone won’t support it."
— Un Lun Dun, China Mieville
— Un Lun Dun, China Mieville
- BridgeConsoleMasher
- Overlord
- Posts: 11630
- Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2018 6:18 am
Re: Cortez marginal tax rate hike
Apparently a lot of the backlash seemed to be from misunderstanding how marginal tax-rates work.
..What mirror universe?
-
- Captain
- Posts: 2948
- Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2017 7:43 pm
Re: Cortez marginal tax rate hike
Well, 70% is a pretty high rate, higher than any other in the world. And some of the scorn AOC's received has been for other factors, such as providing financial security for those unwilling to work.
-
- Captain
- Posts: 1158
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2017 6:13 am
Re: Cortez marginal tax rate hike
Nothing is more mobile than rich people and their money.
- BridgeConsoleMasher
- Overlord
- Posts: 11630
- Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2018 6:18 am
Re: Cortez marginal tax rate hike
I doubt people making $10 million in the states are mobile enough to make $10 million elsewhere.Antiboyscout wrote: ↑Sat Feb 09, 2019 3:21 am Nothing is more mobile than rich people and their money.
..What mirror universe?
-
- Overlord
- Posts: 6303
- Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2017 1:57 am
Re: Cortez marginal tax rate hike
We've had a 70% rate before. They can afford it.Darth Wedgius wrote: ↑Sat Feb 09, 2019 2:56 am Well, 70% is a pretty high rate, higher than any other in the world. And some of the scorn AOC's received has been for other factors, such as providing financial security for those unwilling to work.
"Believe me, there’s nothing so terrible that someone won’t support it."
— Un Lun Dun, China Mieville
— Un Lun Dun, China Mieville
Re: Cortez marginal tax rate hike
A more than acceptable byproduct of taking greater steps to assure those who cannot work, or those for whom work alone is insufficient, don’t live in poverty.Darth Wedgius wrote: ↑Sat Feb 09, 2019 2:56 am And some of the scorn AOC's received has been for other factors, such as providing financial security for those unwilling to work.
(And let’s be real. Most of us have worked with folk who would quit if they didn’t have to to live. Are you REALLY gonna miss having to put up with the attendant half-assing and drama?)
-
- Captain
- Posts: 1158
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2017 6:13 am
Re: Cortez marginal tax rate hike
And here we have someone displaying a complete lack of understanding of incentives, labor markets, and reality.CmdrKing wrote: ↑Sat Feb 09, 2019 2:23 pmA more than acceptable byproduct of taking greater steps to assure those who cannot work, or those for whom work alone is insufficient, don’t live in poverty.Darth Wedgius wrote: ↑Sat Feb 09, 2019 2:56 am And some of the scorn AOC's received has been for other factors, such as providing financial security for those unwilling to work.
(And let’s be real. Most of us have worked with folk who would quit if they didn’t have to to live. Are you REALLY gonna miss having to put up with the attendant half-assing and drama?)
If half-assing and drama is what you have to put up with so the ENTIRE GLOBAL SYSTEM doens't collapse, then you put up with it.
Old soviet saying: "They pretend to pay us and we pretend to work"
Re: Cortez marginal tax rate hike
So the rational thesis is that removing “homelessness and starvation” as a consequence of joblessness will incentivize a sufficient number of workers to leave the labor force as to generate catastrophic labor shortages?
-
- Captain
- Posts: 2948
- Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2017 7:43 pm
Re: Cortez marginal tax rate hike
"They can afford it" doesn't mean that it's right or wise. We can all live in well-insulated tents but most of us would consider that a bit extreme.Fuzzy Necromancer wrote: ↑Sat Feb 09, 2019 4:39 amWe've had a 70% rate before. They can afford it.Darth Wedgius wrote: ↑Sat Feb 09, 2019 2:56 am Well, 70% is a pretty high rate, higher than any other in the world. And some of the scorn AOC's received has been for other factors, such as providing financial security for those unwilling to work.