CharlesPhipps wrote: ↑Sun Feb 10, 2019 4:03 pm
If you don't like an an alternate history game about Nazis winning then that's your business but I think the solution to your response is, "Don't buy the game."
The "don't buy the game" response does not override all criticism.
I didn't hate alt-history before Wolfenstein: The New Order. New Order made me dislike Alt-history simply by how abjectly lazy it had revealed itself to be. I was hoping New Order would put an interesting take on the genre through Wolfenstein's unique pulpy serial lens. Instead it fell into the typical cliches and damaged the series lore to a point that my only means of salvaging the series in my eyes was to consider the new games a reboot wholly unconnected to anything involving the previous games in the series.
I'm an old fan of the Wolfenstein series. I loved them. So when New Order came out I was very quick to decide I'd love it too and pre-ordered it. I actually bothered to play the game the whole way through, earn every achievement, and the more time I played the less I liked it. So my criticism comes from a place of actually expericing the game and understanding the series beforehand.
I remind you Gill is a literal alien with 400 years of technology on his PDA.
Honestly, the thing I hoped from this thread were two things:
1. We could not get bogged down in RL Nazism discussion
2. The whole "efficient government" thing didn't dominate the discussion
What does any of that have to do with my argument that Wolfenstein the New Order is holding onto a stupid idea that has been disproven over time? Nothing I said was a knock against the episode, just the concept of how media has held onto this belief the Nazis were efficient. As for what dominates or doesn't dominate a discussion, sorry, but that's how it rolls. When a specific topic is brought up in the coda of a review, it tends to dominate it.