...never underestimate religious (or any other form of) fundamentalism.
what's losing your spare penis versus showing Kahless the extent of your devotion/your after-life reward.
...never underestimate religious (or any other form of) fundamentalism.
Is that still a thing? I mean... it was established in TNG that Klingons have back ups for everything so its not beyond being canon... but I maintain to this day that something like that absolutely would have been mentioned by Jadzia, Ezri, or one of the other one-dimensional sex mad Klingon women.MissKittyFantastico wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 10:18 pm Just watched through 'Point of Light' and 'Oboe for Karen' again (friends were catching up), and the Klingon material reminded me of a question that's been nagging at me all this time: where's Voq's other cock? It is like dead bodies in 'Heart of Glory', they got to that bit of the operation and were just "Not usin' it anymore, chuck it away"? (Does L'Rell still have it for Executive Time?) They made such a point in season one of establishing the nature of Klingon junk, I feel like I need some closure here.
I don't know that the omission is really telling - Trek's traditionally been pretty prudish about sex, outside of that one discussion between Riker and the J'naii pilot the only times I can off the top of my head think of sexual anatomy even being mentioned have been the occasional juvenile jokes (I want to note that the guy with the knee gets a pass, because that was genuinely funny). And given 24th Century folks' (supposedly) enlightened attitudes, I don't really see a reason Worf's Towers of Qo'noS would've had to have come up in conversation; certainly it's just another day of the week for Jadzia, and Betazeds were supposedly all sexually liberated as well, so I imagine Deanna was very au fait about it. (Given how docile her on-duty demeanour generally was, and how Worf seemed to have a bit of a 'nobody can handle Klingons' idea early on, I love imagining his face when they got back to her quarters after a date, he's taking a deep breath and getting ready to give the 'tell me if anything about me makes you uncomfortable' speech, and she just slaps her butt and says "So how do you want to do this, consecutively or concurrently?")clearspira wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 11:09 pmIs that still a thing? I mean... it was established in TNG that Klingons have back ups for everything so its not beyond being canon... but I maintain to this day that something like that absolutely would have been mentioned by Jadzia, Ezri, or one of the other one-dimensional sex mad Klingon women.
As tempting as it is to assume they've got a quad (I miss Mass Effect) I don't know that it's necessary to satisfy what we know; technically we've got a redundant one already, so if Klingons were to have just two it wouldn't be a glaring omission from their biology. Also I like to preserve canon wherever possible, and this'd let us keep Chuck's 'courage and honour' names for them without having to think up more. As for protection, obviously the first thought is a little set of armoured ridges on their sack, but I feel the more likely option is that they're internal, like with Scarrans. (Alien genitals, AMA.)clearspira wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 11:09 pmI am thinking about this way to hard but what I also want to know is, how many balls must they realistically have if they have two penises? You would think that ''go for his quadruple testicles'' would be the first move in literally every fight given how hard they would be to miss.
C'mon, when have Trekkies ever decided not to obsess about minutiae? (Although Worf'd probably prefer we didn't use that particular word.)Zoinksberg wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 11:35 pmI'm too annoyed that this conversation even has to happen to care about penis puns.
First: hehe, 'minutiae'MissKittyFantastico wrote: ↑Tue Feb 12, 2019 12:19 am C'mon, when have Trekkies ever decided not to obsess about minutiae? (Although Worf'd probably prefer we didn't use that particular word.)