Although the Queen DID dissolve the Austrailian parliament in the 1970s.DAv wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2019 1:46 amThe Queen has that particular power on the condition that she never uses it. One of those quirks of British government.clearspira wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2019 11:40 pm Fascinating. I didn't know the Queen still technically had that power, I thought Charles the first doing that type of stuff led to the English Civil War.
VOY: Remember
- SuccubusYuri
- Officer
- Posts: 345
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 2:21 pm
Re: VOY: Remember
- Wargriffin
- Captain
- Posts: 579
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 9:17 pm
Re: VOY: Remember
It make writing easier when you can just restructured the character with a memory they forgotclearspira wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2019 9:25 am Voyager really liked episodes about buried memories, hidden memories, and fake memories.
"When you rule by fear, your greatest weakness is the one who's no longer afraid."
Re: VOY: Remember
There is no condition, it's just that everyone knows when it would cause trouble.DAv wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2019 1:46 amThe Queen has that particular power on the condition that she never uses it. One of those quirks of British government.clearspira wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2019 11:40 pm Fascinating. I didn't know the Queen still technically had that power, I thought Charles the first doing that type of stuff led to the English Civil War.
When she does exercise it when it's clearly of use there is no problem, as everyone sees the since in it, as in Yuri's example of the Australia's crisis.
Any British monarch could try to go back to exercising their powers like they did before Anne. We all know how that would turn out, but that does not mean they wouldn't be without the freedom to do so or in violation of anything.
The cornerstone of British government is Common Law with its pragmatism and emphasis on precedent. To lay out something in clear and solidly establish it is an alien concept and something more American and Continental in outlook.Beelzquill wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2019 11:49 pm Fascinating. I didn't know the Queen still technically had that power, I thought Charles the first doing that type of stuff led to the English Civil War.
Charles and the Civil War was more nuanced and didn't have anything to do with him violating any law rather than ignoring the demands and interests of Parliament upon whom he required financing when they wanted concessions in return for it.
All of that is at the heart of Montagu's comment about how Parliament could fight the king 100 times and they couldn't win while all he had to do was win once and they'd all be dead.
-
- Captain
- Posts: 857
- Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2018 12:04 pm
Re: VOY: Remember
In the comics it's mostly associated with time-travel stories where the Mutant Registration Act became the first step towards mutant death camps.TrueMetis wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2019 11:33 pm Only saw a couple episodes, yeah it's pretty fucked up.
As for the mutant registration act, they never go in depth as to what exactly it entails. I do know in a lot of the comics if you didn't register, whatever registering entailed, you where thrown into prison. Which in of itself suggests the act was too extreme.
Which is one reason why, when Marvel did Civil War several years later fans automatically sided with the anti-Registration crowd, because they were fighting against a law called the Superhuman Registration Act (which, ironically, specifically excluded mutants, although the reasons given for the mutants staying it out were pitiful). Even if the SRA was more benign than the MRA (whether or not it was depended on who was writing a particular issue), you might as well have called it the Jim Crow Act for all the PR damage that did.
Generally the MRA itself was just depicted as "if you are a mutant you must register as such with the government", but the mutants fought it because they saw- correctly- that it was the first step towards much worse. The only problem with this though is that the X-Men themselves expect the government to respect the rights and privacy of mutants but routinely violate the rights and privacy of both humans AND mutants themselves.
Re: VOY: Remember
Just need to find a "Happy Belated Genocide" card to slip this into...
UGxlYXNlIHByb3ZpZGUgeW91ciBjaGFsbGVuZ2UgcmVzcG9uc2UgZm9yIFJFRCA5NC4K
Re: VOY: Remember
It's worth noting that something regarding Torres's brain happens again later, in "Random Thoughts", wherein that telepathic society excises violent thoughts from people's heads.
Of course, that's nothing compared to all the psychic violence that happened to Tuvok. There's a reason why, in the Star Trek Titan novels, they noted that all the damage done to Tuvok over the years on Voyager made it to where he was going to have to refrain from using telepathy, because of all the telepathic trauma he went through.
Of course, that's nothing compared to all the psychic violence that happened to Tuvok. There's a reason why, in the Star Trek Titan novels, they noted that all the damage done to Tuvok over the years on Voyager made it to where he was going to have to refrain from using telepathy, because of all the telepathic trauma he went through.
Re: VOY: Remember
Well, sort of. In Britain, when a later act overrides an earlier act, the later one takes precedence (this is disfavoured in the United States, where judges use may make reasonable interpretations to reconcile them). However, if they passed some ridiculous act that overrode something that is perceived to be a "constitutional statute", then they must explicitly declare that they are overriding that act. Of course, there's nothing written down stopping them from doing that, only convention and public outcry.Beelzquill wrote: ↑Sat Mar 16, 2019 11:11 pm edit: The U.K. is under parliamentary supremacy right? Does that mean that Parliament could pass really ridiculous extreme versions of this with just above 50%? I don't know how Parliament works so forgive my ignorance.
- Yukaphile
- Overlord
- Posts: 8778
- Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2017 8:14 am
- Location: Rabid Posting World
- Contact:
Re: VOY: Remember
I'm curious, why didn't this episode get a 20 Dollar Bill award from Chuck? I mean, it was a direct parallel to the stuff the Nazis and Soviets did in their country.
"A culture's teachings - and more importantly, the nature of its people - achieve definition in conflict. They find themselves, or find themselves lacking."
— Kreia, Knights of the Old Republic 2: The Sith Lords
— Kreia, Knights of the Old Republic 2: The Sith Lords
- Beelzquill
- Officer
- Posts: 453
- Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2017 4:55 am
Re: VOY: Remember
I think he didn't give it the 20 dollar bill award because the main characters of Voyager didn't actually commit the genocide this time. It was other characters who committed it in the past and were covering it up.