This is for topical issues effecting our fair world... you can quit snickering anytime. Note: It is the desire of the leadership of SFDebris Conglomerate that all posters maintain a civil and polite bearing in this forum, regardless of how you feel about any particular issue. Violators will be turned over to Captain Janeway for experimentation.
Yukaphile wrote: ↑Wed Mar 27, 2019 10:12 am
Okay, seriously, WHY do you call it "the progressive media," Admiral X, eh?
Because that is the agenda they are pushing. Just like Fox does for conservative Christians.
You are aware that even on very left-leaning stations like MSNBC, they have a news segment specifically dedicated to a Republican known as Morning Joe?
From what I recall, Fox has a token "liberal", too. It just gives their watchers someone to rage against.
Just more proof that since the 1970s, Libertarians are just GOP Lite.
Again, statements like this show you don't really know what you're talking about when it comes to libertarians, who literally span the entire left/right spectrum, as well as having their own version of moderate to extremist when it comes to just how libertarian they are.
"Black care rarely sits behind a rider whose pace is fast enough."
-TR
Yukaphile wrote: ↑Wed Mar 27, 2019 10:12 am
Libertarians are just GOP Lite.
Give the man a cigar! Libertarian: For when you want to continue redlining and massive wealth inequity, but still like weed and "sticking it to the man".
Because the well connected won't redline access to wealth socialist states...
I don't see what that has to do with the practice of creating zoning ordinances that deny services (often private ones like banking and grocery stores) to certain areas of a city.
Again, statements like this show you don't really know what you're talking about when it comes to libertarians, who literally span the entire left/right spectrum, as well as having their own version of moderate to extremist when it comes to just how libertarian they are.
