Captain Marvel: The MCU's First Failure?

For all topics regarding speculative fiction of every stripe. Otherwise known as the Geek Cave.
Fuzzy Necromancer
Overlord
Posts: 6303
Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2017 1:57 am

Re: Captain Marvel: The MCU's First Failure?

Post by Fuzzy Necromancer »

Makeshift Python wrote: Tue Apr 09, 2019 2:14 am It’s almost as if the TRANSFORMERS films were primarily aimed at children...
Yeah, because nothing screams "for the kids" like a PG13 rating
"Believe me, there’s nothing so terrible that someone won’t support it."
— Un Lun Dun, China Mieville
MissKittyFantastico
Officer
Posts: 402
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 5:35 am

Re: Captain Marvel: The MCU's First Failure?

Post by MissKittyFantastico »

I mean, if we're being honest they're for Michael Bay, the Venn diagram just has a ton of overlap with 'juvenile'.
User avatar
Makeshift Python
Captain
Posts: 1599
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 2:37 pm

Re: Captain Marvel: The MCU's First Failure?

Post by Makeshift Python »

Fuzzy Necromancer wrote: Tue Apr 09, 2019 5:15 am
Makeshift Python wrote: Tue Apr 09, 2019 2:14 am It’s almost as if the TRANSFORMERS films were primarily aimed at children...
Yeah, because nothing screams "for the kids" like a PG13 rating
Most movies are these days. For example: every MCU film.
Fuzzy Necromancer
Overlord
Posts: 6303
Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2017 1:57 am

Re: Captain Marvel: The MCU's First Failure?

Post by Fuzzy Necromancer »

Bayformers was made to appeal to adult nostalgia,not to children.
"Believe me, there’s nothing so terrible that someone won’t support it."
— Un Lun Dun, China Mieville
User avatar
Yukaphile
Overlord
Posts: 8778
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2017 8:14 am
Location: Rabid Posting World
Contact:

Re: Captain Marvel: The MCU's First Failure?

Post by Yukaphile »

It just reinforces what I keep saying elsewhere. Bay, Orci, and Kurtzman are Hollywood poison. And Bay's only good movie was The Rock.
"A culture's teachings - and more importantly, the nature of its people - achieve definition in conflict. They find themselves, or find themselves lacking."
— Kreia, Knights of the Old Republic 2: The Sith Lords
MissKittyFantastico
Officer
Posts: 402
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 5:35 am

Re: Captain Marvel: The MCU's First Failure?

Post by MissKittyFantastico »

Fuzzy Necromancer wrote: Tue Apr 09, 2019 7:35 amBayformers was made to appeal to adult nostalgia,not to children.
I'm not so sure about that. Marketed to adult nostalgia, sure, but from all I've read Team Bay's attitude towards the original property was indifference at best, if not outright derision. They certainly never shied away from crowbarring in whatever ideas Bay thought were cool, no matter how poor a fit they were for G1. The difference between them and Bumblebee, which I felt did appear very strongly to G1 nostalgia (in addition to having a solid story in its own right), is night and day.
Yukaphile wrote: Tue Apr 09, 2019 9:46 amAnd Bay's only good movie was The Rock.
I'm not claiming it's a better quality film by any means, but I find Armageddon very enjoyable - it's kind of that magic moment when circumstances made Michael Bay Doing Michael Bay Stuff exactly the right play. It's the cinematic equivalent of fast food, but it's a damn fine hamburger.
User avatar
Yukaphile
Overlord
Posts: 8778
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2017 8:14 am
Location: Rabid Posting World
Contact:

Re: Captain Marvel: The MCU's First Failure?

Post by Yukaphile »

Well, I haven't seen that in forever, and I know the science is bad, but... tbh, is there any juvenile stuff there like there is in Transformers? If so, I might just have to bump it up. Because Chuck did praise it by saying they caught a science error there that they missed over on Enterprise.
"A culture's teachings - and more importantly, the nature of its people - achieve definition in conflict. They find themselves, or find themselves lacking."
— Kreia, Knights of the Old Republic 2: The Sith Lords
MissKittyFantastico
Officer
Posts: 402
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 5:35 am

Re: Captain Marvel: The MCU's First Failure?

Post by MissKittyFantastico »

Yukaphile wrote: Wed Apr 10, 2019 12:22 amWell, I haven't seen that in forever, and I know the science is bad, but... tbh, is there any juvenile stuff there like there is in Transformers?
At no point does a robot pee on anyone, so there's that. It's not a highbrow film but for what it's worth I never had that "Oh FFS did we need to do that?" feeling that I got from Transformers 1-3 every time they did something Bay presumably thought was hilarious. (I haven't watched 4 or 5 - which says it all for the Bay series really, I did not watch a Transformers film. That's like Quark seeing a dropped slip of latinum on the floor and not bothering to pick it up.)
User avatar
Yukaphile
Overlord
Posts: 8778
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2017 8:14 am
Location: Rabid Posting World
Contact:

Re: Captain Marvel: The MCU's First Failure?

Post by Yukaphile »

Or Kurtzman or Orci. You never know.
"A culture's teachings - and more importantly, the nature of its people - achieve definition in conflict. They find themselves, or find themselves lacking."
— Kreia, Knights of the Old Republic 2: The Sith Lords
User avatar
Makeshift Python
Captain
Posts: 1599
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 2:37 pm

Re: Captain Marvel: The MCU's First Failure?

Post by Makeshift Python »

As far as Michael Bay films go, THE ROCK is his best but I actually prefer BAD BOYS II where it's, for better or worse, the most Bay-sey film he ever made. The only thing I can knock on that movie is its long running time, but Michael Bay movies post-THE ROCK have all had the same issue of running much longer than they were justified to be. Like there's simply no fucking reason a Transformers movie needs to be two and a half hours fucking long.
Post Reply