Actually, supernovas devastate nearby systems as well. If Sirius B went boom in a type 1A supernova, it would wipe out all life in the Sol system and everything within ten parsecs.Enterprising wrote: ↑Sat Jan 18, 2020 12:12 am"Prime" IS the Kelvinverse, that's what I've been trying to say. Prime is the universe that's jumpstarts the 2009 movie, it's an attempted clever wordplay by those who re-booted Star Trek, as a means to try and fool classic Star Trek fans this is still "real" Star Trek, it isn't. Spock "Prime" is not the Spock we know and love from 1964 to 1991, it's the one from 2009 who launches the red matter thingy into the magic supernova that figured out how to destroy multiple solar systems.Mecha82 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2020 7:52 pm All signs based on trailers indicate that Picard takes place in prime timeline. Not in Kelvinverse. What is basis for this speculation that it might not take place in Prime time line? Also I find it strange that there are people that want something to fail before it's even out. I mean why not want something to be good and successful instead.
Classic Star Trek is a universe where a supernova only destroys the solar system of its origin.
And while it would take years for the explosion to reach Romulus, evacuating an entire planet is not something that can be done overnight. It was going to take a Herculean effort to evacuate and restore Kronos with decades to do it. So, while evacuating, they also developed red matter in hopes of saving Romulus only they were not ready in time.
Here's hoping we get a better explanation of what exactly happened since the movie only glossed over it.
Really, the 25% difference rule is much easier to do going into the future. The actors and therefore the characters are older and look different. Ships, uniforms, and technology are going to look different. They should have just kept moving forward instead of trying to reboot the franchise.
And I pointed out the French Resistance because it was clearly the inspiration for the Bajoran Militia.