Out of place minority inclusion often involving literal revisionist history in order to appeal to modernist inclusivity and diversity pushes, and of course painting them as inherently good things.Rocketboy1313 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 15, 2020 5:58 pmWell, there aren't too many games that are about Medicare for all, Unionization, the minimum wage, universal suffrage, or whatever else you may qualify as progressive.Antiboyscout wrote: ↑Sat Feb 15, 2020 5:18 pm
OR, It's because you agree with the politics in question
Never is it an honest exploration of the politics in question. When has progressive ideology been painted in a negative light or even in shades of gray?
I guess you could say, environmentalism is a big part of games, but a lot of that depends on magic versus technology as a metaphor and in the real world magic isn't real, so the literal-ness of many environmental messages falls flat and you have to think in terms of the bad guys being metaphors for climate change and magic in terms of renewable/sustainable development. But even then, most of the time the metaphor involves using violence to win the argument.
I guess you could look at games like "Stardew Valley" but that isn't a commune, it is still a capitalist game, it just looks down on corporations sucking the life out of people.
Most games are conflict based and the use of fire arms or strength is often the deciding factor on defeating the bad guy.
I don't know if you would qualify that as inherently Progressive, but I don't.
I would argue the overwhelming amount of games out there tilt toward points 11 and 12 of fascism rather than anything related to Progressive politics.
http://www.openculture.com/2016/11/umberto-eco-makes-a-list-of-the-14-common-features-of-fascism.html
Why wouldn't you assume Stardew Valley is an environmentalist game. They literally label the corporate cola trash that can be fished out of the rivers.
Do you not consider Anti-Fa and the concept of the 'workers revolution' as progressive?