Oh, that's an interesting thought.
Yeah, I actually would love to write a remake for this movie. Although a lot would have to be rethought, plot-wise. Another thing- the "spare Saturn rocket sitting around" plot point would be an even harder sell now than in the '80s. Maybe set it a few years in the future and make it "experimental/prototype Mars rocket" instead?
Moontrap Review
Re: Moontrap Review
Eh, start it "en media res" with a new moon race to check out the edifice on the moon.
-
- Overlord
- Posts: 6317
- Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2017 1:57 am
Re: Moontrap Review
Honestly, given that in this setting we already have the space-going equivalent of U-Haul trucks, I don't understand why we didn't just adapt one of those to the purpose.The Romulan Republic wrote:Oh, that's an interesting thought.
Yeah, I actually would love to write a remake for this movie. Although a lot would have to be rethought, plot-wise. Another thing- the "spare Saturn rocket sitting around" plot point would be an even harder sell now than in the '80s. Maybe set it a few years in the future and make it "experimental/prototype Mars rocket" instead?
"Believe me, there’s nothing so terrible that someone won’t support it."
— Un Lun Dun, China Mieville
— Un Lun Dun, China Mieville
-
- Captain
- Posts: 748
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 12:02 pm
Re: Moontrap Review
The more I read this, the more I want to try to write a script of a Moontrap reboot.
It would be a fun exercise, trying to make it work as a serious SF film.
It would be a fun exercise, trying to make it work as a serious SF film.
-
- Officer
- Posts: 118
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 5:28 am
Re: Moontrap Review
Actually that becomes a lot easier today. Instead of making it a "Spare Saturn V" make it an untested prototype SLS (Space Launch System). Those are close enough to actual testing that by the time any movie was made they would be workable. They were just doing engine tests last week.The Romulan Republic wrote:Oh, that's an interesting thought.
Yeah, I actually would love to write a remake for this movie. Although a lot would have to be rethought, plot-wise. Another thing- the "spare Saturn rocket sitting around" plot point would be an even harder sell now than in the '80s. Maybe set it a few years in the future and make it "experimental/prototype Mars rocket" instead?
Just have them retrofit an old Apollo capsule or slap a not yet ready Orion one on top. I think they still have 3 or 4 LEM's. If the ascent engine has never been fueled they should still be relatively pristine and usable, even after decades on display. At least believably enough for a movie.
Re: Moontrap Review
Well, how about making it a Chinese mission? They've already landed one rover, with another one scheduled for next year, and have stated that they plan to land a maned mission by 2036.
Re: Moontrap Review
17 years ago, the Chinese announced plans to, among other things, put a man on the moon by 2010. I believe the closest they got to it was putting up a two space stations (This reminds me of the South Korean robot city Chuck mentioned one time). They've given themselves about twice as much time now, but between completing their space station (2022?) and the likely need to build a heavy lift rocket first, a Taikonaut on the moon by 2036 stradles plausible and unlikely, though it definitely beats Musk's Martian Madness (Mars colony by 2024? Get real.)J!! wrote:Well, how about making it a Chinese mission? They've already landed one rover, with another one scheduled for next year, and have stated that they plan to land a maned mission by 2036.