GreyICE wrote: ↑Sun May 10, 2020 6:55 pm
Obamacare is extremely precedented, and very mild. Nearly the entire world covers pre-existing conditions, for instance (they don't even have an idea of the concept). Every idea in it was extremely pedestrian and often common sense. That's ultimately why the Republicans couldn't repeal it - they knew that the measures were wildly popular, and if the Democrats could point and say "they took X away" then they'd get crucified at the ballot box. Hence why, with complete control of the Presidency, the House, and the Senate, they still stood still and decided to do nothing. There was nothing revolutionary in "Obamacare", there was nothing even that progressive.
I'm not talking about worldly revolution lol I'm talking about the US history. tbs, What, does China or India have UHC? Does the European Union organize subsidized healthcare?
It is the biggest development of the healthcare system since WWII. It wasn't particularly cheap so it's not impossible for it to be scrutinized, but it's nonetheless effective to a capacity and is ultimately an indication of government orchestrating rational fiscal directives that cooperate with a market economy. I believe Obama has explicitly deemed it inadequate, but simultaneously remarked about it being improved upon.
So yes, when Republicans can't knock its pins in spite of its exuberant costs then I'm content.
Biden is a step backwards in all relevant areas. Climate Change, healthcare, wherever you look his plan is to do the least he can do. A wit put it this way: "Joe Biden's car repair: we restore your car to the exact condition it was in five minutes before the wheels came off."
I'd be happy to vote against Biden were he the Republican candidate, which really would not be that unlikely given how conservative he generally is. But instead he's running against a guy who tries to tell you the fact your car is on fire is fake news - while he's standing next to an empty fuel can, holding a lighter, and his pants smell of gasoline.
If you want to get into specifics that'd be cool. I believe at the very least he has been able to produce sound bites for key agendas, contrary to what you're indicating about his platforms. Until further notice or more specific information then I'm not of the mind to undermine his generally progressive campaign.