The Matrix is a Trans Allegory now

For all topics regarding speculative fiction of every stripe. Otherwise known as the Geek Cave.
User avatar
McAvoy
Captain
Posts: 3800
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2019 3:55 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: The Matrix is a Trans Allegory now

Post by McAvoy »

Fuzzy Necromancer wrote: Tue Aug 25, 2020 4:00 am
McAvoy wrote: Tue Aug 25, 2020 2:35 am Is it that obvious though that it is a trans allegory originally though? When it first came out before the W sisters were W brothers and all we got that it could be a trans allegory was the character Switch?
Yes. Trans people are trans people even when they aren't ready to be out and face the dangers that come with that.
No I am talking about the general public. When the directors werd still brothers and not sisters. I am talking about when the movie first came out and even after the thd sequels came out.

Can you honestly say at that point it was a trans allegory?
I got nothing to say here.
Fuzzy Necromancer
Overlord
Posts: 6247
Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2017 1:57 am

Re: The Matrix is a Trans Allegory now

Post by Fuzzy Necromancer »

Yup. Not their fault if you looked at it through a cis lens.
"Believe me, there’s nothing so terrible that someone won’t support it."
— Un Lun Dun, China Mieville
User avatar
clearspira
Overlord
Posts: 5603
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 12:51 pm

Re: The Matrix is a Trans Allegory now

Post by clearspira »

Fuzzy Necromancer wrote: Tue Aug 25, 2020 5:07 am Yup. Not their fault if you looked at it through a cis lens.
Is that another way of saying ''we looked at it as a film about robots enslaving humanity rather than some secret story about transpeople?''
User avatar
clearspira
Overlord
Posts: 5603
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 12:51 pm

Re: The Matrix is a Trans Allegory now

Post by clearspira »

Rocketboy1313 wrote: Tue Aug 25, 2020 2:21 am
clearspira wrote: Mon Aug 24, 2020 4:20 pm Because people lie/exaggerate when they have something to gain? Like, for example, Lana Wachowski who has spent every waking Twitter moment since the right adopted the red pill as their symbol losing her mind over it. The thing is friend, is that the following conversation, the one that is so often used to prove that the Wachowski's were referring to gender and transpeople, can indeed be used to describe any ideology you think is controlling the world and that every institution is in on except for you and your buddies. Feminism, capitalism, socialism, fascism, religion, round earthers. Doesn't matter. Its just that the right managed to steal it first and Lana hates them for it.
The author of the work is a trans person who said the movie was about transgenderism.
And you think she is just saying that in retrospect because she dislikes wingnuts coopting her movie for their stupid worldview? And refuting them is the thing she has to gain?
So, rather than look at the creators of the work, the obvious symbolism which has been pointed out many times prior to "red pill" being a term used by right wing chuds, and the stuff that was in the production notes about a transgender character being in the script till being cut... You are instead trying to pick apart the script?

I repeat my earlier point, the film is so obviously what it is that trying to pick it apart to argue this is fucking baffling. You sound like a loon.
Symbolism is in the eye of the beholder. To some, the fact that Deckard has glowing eyes for a single scene is absolute proof that he is a replicant as it is symbolic of replicant eyes. To others, his eyes just caught the light. To some, Mr Anderson becoming Neo is symbolic of a transperson choosing his/her new name. To others, its because it was his online alias and nothing more. It would be like me meeting Morpheus and him calling me Clearspira. It is something that can be interpreted in many different ways and you are refusing to see that.

And BTW, let me ask you this although I do not expect an answer: whatever problems the Wachowski's had in getting their trans character to the fore in The Matrix is because they were little known creators still beholden to the studio. AFTER the first Matrix, they were juggernauts who got permission for two sequels in which they clearly had creative freedom for. So why no trans character in Reloaded or Revolutions? That was apparently the whole secret plot behind the first film and yet, as I have said previously, the allegory breaks the moment you include the Sequels for there is no apparent continuation of the theme. The Matrix is now nothing more than a fantasy invented by an old white man to create Neo after Neo in order to save Zion. The closest we get to LGBT representation here are the two women who kiss during the Zion rave.

Shall I tell you what i would have done? Do what the Wachowskis wanted to do with the Switch character with Niobe. And you know what? If they established Morpheus as being gay (easily done given how Morpheus was not established as being hetero) then you actually do not need to change the film much at all given how it is already a B-plot that they were once in a relationship together.

Would actually make for quite an interesting plot now that I think about it, Morpheus falling in love with the male-bodied version of Niobe in the real world only to find out the truth the first time they visit The Matrix together which then causes strife as Morpheus has to confront some of his prejudices. Maybe the reason ''why'' they broke up in the first place was because Commander Lock was more progressive in such matters than him? Maybe it would create a conflict between the two as the end of The Matrix would mean Niobe being imprisoned inside her male body forever as opposed to these fleeting moments of freedom that she currently enjoys?
Sounds better than the generic love triangle we otherwise got imo.
User avatar
BridgeConsoleMasher
Overlord
Posts: 11583
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2018 6:18 am

Re: The Matrix is a Trans Allegory now

Post by BridgeConsoleMasher »

McAvoy wrote: Tue Aug 25, 2020 4:44 am
Fuzzy Necromancer wrote: Tue Aug 25, 2020 4:00 am
McAvoy wrote: Tue Aug 25, 2020 2:35 am Is it that obvious though that it is a trans allegory originally though? When it first came out before the W sisters were W brothers and all we got that it could be a trans allegory was the character Switch?
Yes. Trans people are trans people even when they aren't ready to be out and face the dangers that come with that.
No I am talking about the general public. When the directors werd still brothers and not sisters. I am talking about when the movie first came out and even after the thd sequels came out.

Can you honestly say at that point it was a trans allegory?
Look though, it was merely a few a years before one of them was up front and transitioned in the public. I'm of the mind that it's particularly less likely that her budding of transness was within such a short time frame.
..What mirror universe?
GreyICE
Captain
Posts: 1011
Joined: Mon May 29, 2017 7:12 pm

Re: The Matrix is a Trans Allegory now

Post by GreyICE »

BridgeConsoleMasher wrote: Wed Aug 26, 2020 10:59 pmLook though, it was merely a few a years before one of them was up front and transitioned in the public. I'm of the mind that it's particularly less likely that her budding of transness was within such a short time frame.
When I did some research because of this thread, apparently there were rumors in the tabloids from during the shooting of the movies. So it's possible she delayed any announcement until the movies were released to not screw up marketing or scare off the producers. I'm sure she realized that coming out as trans would not help them with creative control, ticket sales, or budget. Hollywood is not known as friendly to trans people - it's known as rather the exact opposite.
Knowledge-Based Education – We oppose the teaching of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) (values clarification), critical thinking skills and similar programs

- Republican Party Platform
User avatar
BridgeConsoleMasher
Overlord
Posts: 11583
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2018 6:18 am

Re: The Matrix is a Trans Allegory now

Post by BridgeConsoleMasher »

https://www.quora.com/How-long-after-realising-you-were-trans-did-you-wait-until-coming-out-Were-people-supportive-How-long-after-that-did-you-start-your-transition

You get a few responses where people transition within a few years, but a lot of them involve a rather extensive process.

For it to not be a trans story, you'd have to work against probably like 85% chance that this was a long-term development, moreso considering the fact that they both transitioned, not to mention that it's a very intimate topic to lie about.

There's a lot less reason to believe that she's lying.
..What mirror universe?
User avatar
McAvoy
Captain
Posts: 3800
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2019 3:55 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: The Matrix is a Trans Allegory now

Post by McAvoy »

BridgeConsoleMasher wrote: Wed Aug 26, 2020 10:59 pm
McAvoy wrote: Tue Aug 25, 2020 4:44 am
Fuzzy Necromancer wrote: Tue Aug 25, 2020 4:00 am
McAvoy wrote: Tue Aug 25, 2020 2:35 am Is it that obvious though that it is a trans allegory originally though? When it first came out before the W sisters were W brothers and all we got that it could be a trans allegory was the character Switch?
Yes. Trans people are trans people even when they aren't ready to be out and face the dangers that come with that.
No I am talking about the general public. When the directors werd still brothers and not sisters. I am talking about when the movie first came out and even after the thd sequels came out.

Can you honestly say at that point it was a trans allegory?
Look though, it was merely a few a years before one of them was up front and transitioned in the public. I'm of the mind that it's particularly less likely that her budding of transness was within such a short time frame.
Lana was the first with being officially full transitioned by 2008 and then making her first public appearance by 2012. From what I read, there were rumors in early 2000's.

Look I don't doubt the W Sisters see The Matrix series as a Trans allegory. But to say it was obvious from the start for others than them, is just dishonest. It's only obvious in hindsight.
I got nothing to say here.
GreyICE
Captain
Posts: 1011
Joined: Mon May 29, 2017 7:12 pm

Re: The Matrix is a Trans Allegory now

Post by GreyICE »

McAvoy wrote: Thu Aug 27, 2020 1:26 amLana was the first with being officially full transitioned by 2008 and then making her first public appearance by 2012. From what I read, there were rumors in early 2000's.

Look I don't doubt the W Sisters see The Matrix series as a Trans allegory. But to say it was obvious from the start for others than them, is just dishonest. It's only obvious in hindsight.
Obvious in hindsight is very different from "wasn't an allegory in any way, and that was invented at a later date" like ClearSpira is arguing. The fact that Superman started as an expression of anger of Jewish people towards bigotry wasn't especially obvious to the readers, who loved the stories of the super strong guy beating up assholes. It's obvious in hindsight though, once you listen to the creators and learn a little about them.
Knowledge-Based Education – We oppose the teaching of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) (values clarification), critical thinking skills and similar programs

- Republican Party Platform
User avatar
McAvoy
Captain
Posts: 3800
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2019 3:55 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: The Matrix is a Trans Allegory now

Post by McAvoy »

GreyICE wrote: Thu Aug 27, 2020 2:10 am
McAvoy wrote: Thu Aug 27, 2020 1:26 amLana was the first with being officially full transitioned by 2008 and then making her first public appearance by 2012. From what I read, there were rumors in early 2000's.

Look I don't doubt the W Sisters see The Matrix series as a Trans allegory. But to say it was obvious from the start for others than them, is just dishonest. It's only obvious in hindsight.
Obvious in hindsight is very different from "wasn't an allegory in any way, and that was invented at a later date" like ClearSpira is arguing. The fact that Superman started as an expression of anger of Jewish people towards bigotry wasn't especially obvious to the readers, who loved the stories of the super strong guy beating up assholes. It's obvious in hindsight though, once you listen to the creators and learn a little about them.
Tbh, originally I was like that myself. But the more I thought about it I realized that since both of the W Sisters had to have the feelings during the filming of the first movie that it made sense for them to view their work as that. Especially when you research it, they barely talk about their own transitions and the lead up to it.

But yeah, in hindsight you can see it. But at the time the viewer wouldn't have seen it as that. It's why it was used as a alegory of anything. Even Flat Earthers...
I got nothing to say here.
Post Reply