This is for topical issues effecting our fair world... you can quit snickering anytime. Note: It is the desire of the leadership of SFDebris Conglomerate that all posters maintain a civil and polite bearing in this forum, regardless of how you feel about any particular issue. Violators will be turned over to Captain Janeway for experimentation.
hammerofglass wrote: ↑Fri Jul 26, 2024 10:59 am
If the Harris campaign started selling "Cackling Kamala" shirts the way the Biden campaign stole the Brandon meme I'd absolutely buy and wear them.
Whether it's true or not, doesn't really matter. It's funny and fitting regardless.
"If you get shot up by an A6M Reisen and your plane splits into pieces - does that mean it's divided by Zero?
- xoxSAUERKRAUTxox
hammerofglass wrote: ↑Fri Jul 26, 2024 10:59 am
If the Harris campaign started selling "Cackling Kamala" shirts the way the Biden campaign stole the Brandon meme I'd absolutely buy and wear them.
Whether it's true or not, doesn't really matter. It's funny and fitting regardless.
Madner Kami wrote: ↑Fri Jul 26, 2024 8:08 am
Harris' late nomination might actually be the critical advantage here. It leaves the Republicans with a tactic to fight an old man while facing a young woman and they have to scramble to come up with something that makes at least superficial sense (unlike "Cackling Kamala") and doesn't disenfranchise their entire female voter-cohort.
Read an article yesterday that the Trump Campaign is struggling with a new name for Kamala. Apparently they are trying to avoid anyway that might annoy any voter base that might take offense to any misogynistic or racial undertones of proposed nicknames.
Madner Kami wrote: ↑Fri Jul 26, 2024 8:08 am
Harris' late nomination might actually be the critical advantage here. It leaves the Republicans with a tactic to fight an old man while facing a young woman and they have to scramble to come up with something that makes at least superficial sense (unlike "Cackling Kamala") and doesn't disenfranchise their entire female voter-cohort.
Read an article yesterday that the Trump Campaign is struggling with a new name for Kamala. Apparently they are trying to avoid anyway that might annoy any voter base that might take offense to any misogynistic or racial undertones of proposed nicknames.
Why? Who's out there offended by racism or misogyny and still voting for Trump?
...for space is wide, and good friends are too few.
Madner Kami wrote: ↑Fri Jul 26, 2024 8:08 am
Harris' late nomination might actually be the critical advantage here. It leaves the Republicans with a tactic to fight an old man while facing a young woman and they have to scramble to come up with something that makes at least superficial sense (unlike "Cackling Kamala") and doesn't disenfranchise their entire female voter-cohort.
Read an article yesterday that the Trump Campaign is struggling with a new name for Kamala. Apparently they are trying to avoid anyway that might annoy any voter base that might take offense to any misogynistic or racial undertones of proposed nicknames.
Why? Who's out there offended by racism or misogyny and still voting for Trump?
More about the moderate voters. Not the MAGA voters. They will vote for Trump even if he shot one of them dead on fifth Avenue.
Madner Kami wrote: ↑Fri Jul 26, 2024 8:08 am
Harris' late nomination might actually be the critical advantage here. It leaves the Republicans with a tactic to fight an old man while facing a young woman and they have to scramble to come up with something that makes at least superficial sense (unlike "Cackling Kamala") and doesn't disenfranchise their entire female voter-cohort.
Read an article yesterday that the Trump Campaign is struggling with a new name for Kamala. Apparently they are trying to avoid anyway that might annoy any voter base that might take offense to any misogynistic or racial undertones of proposed nicknames.
Why? Who's out there offended by racism or misogyny and still voting for Trump?
Women, primarilly. Cognitive Dissonance can be quite jarring, but there are limits. There is a difference between him being a misogynistic arsehole who "grabs them by the pussy" and him attacking Kamala for the fact of being a woman. A good amount may have a fetish for being shat on (figuratively and literally), but it sure as hell isn't the case for the majority of the 39% of women who voted for that shitstain in 2016.
"If you get shot up by an A6M Reisen and your plane splits into pieces - does that mean it's divided by Zero?
- xoxSAUERKRAUTxox
Madner Kami wrote: ↑Fri Jul 26, 2024 8:08 am
Harris' late nomination might actually be the critical advantage here. It leaves the Republicans with a tactic to fight an old man while facing a young woman and they have to scramble to come up with something that makes at least superficial sense (unlike "Cackling Kamala") and doesn't disenfranchise their entire female voter-cohort.
Read an article yesterday that the Trump Campaign is struggling with a new name for Kamala. Apparently they are trying to avoid anyway that might annoy any voter base that might take offense to any misogynistic or racial undertones of proposed nicknames.
Why? Who's out there offended by racism or misogyny and still voting for Trump?
Women, primarilly. Cognitive Dissonance can be quite jarring, but there are limits. There is a difference between him being a misogynistic arsehole who "grabs them by the pussy" and him attacking Kamala for the fact of being a woman. A good amount may have a fetish for being shat on (figuratively and literally), but it sure as hell isn't the case for the majority of the 39% of women who voted for that shitstain in 2016.
Trump had 42% of the votes from women. But from what I can remember a little more than half of white women (I think 56%) voted for Trump.
So yeah, criticize Kamala based on her skin and gender, you will get some pissed off women.
Madner Kami wrote: ↑Fri Jul 26, 2024 8:08 am
Harris' late nomination might actually be the critical advantage here. It leaves the Republicans with a tactic to fight an old man while facing a young woman and they have to scramble to come up with something that makes at least superficial sense (unlike "Cackling Kamala") and doesn't disenfranchise their entire female voter-cohort.
Read an article yesterday that the Trump Campaign is struggling with a new name for Kamala. Apparently they are trying to avoid anyway that might annoy any voter base that might take offense to any misogynistic or racial undertones of proposed nicknames.
Why? Who's out there offended by racism or misogyny and still voting for Trump?
I mean a lot of it does come down to branding more than platform values. These kind of things have distinct weight of the matter moving forward and a lot of people see past transgressions as just that.
