Whenever I see people arguing about shit like pink and blue, I like to imagine the Comedian from Watchmen shaking his head.McAvoy wrote: ↑Wed Sep 09, 2020 4:24 amWouldn't have been a big a deal pre-50's. Pink being a stronger color than blue. That and there was a period that baby/toddler boys were photographed in dresses.
Or that men wore stockings or high heels. Or worse makeup or wigs.
Almost like fashion changes over time on what boys wear and what girls wear...
The CisHets Are at it Again
- clearspira
- Overlord
- Posts: 5655
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 12:51 pm
Re: The CisHets Are at it Again
-
- Captain
- Posts: 1158
- Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2017 6:13 am
Re: The CisHets Are at it Again
Ah, accusing your enemy of what you yourself are doing. What exactly do you think turning "CISHET" into a slur is other than dragging the Overton window to the left?
Re: The CisHets Are at it Again
Tell me about it. Especially when we are talking about babies. Like babies care what they wear. Only parents do.clearspira wrote: ↑Sat Sep 12, 2020 1:14 pmWhenever I see people arguing about shit like pink and blue, I like to imagine the Comedian from Watchmen shaking his head.McAvoy wrote: ↑Wed Sep 09, 2020 4:24 amWouldn't have been a big a deal pre-50's. Pink being a stronger color than blue. That and there was a period that baby/toddler boys were photographed in dresses.
Or that men wore stockings or high heels. Or worse makeup or wigs.
Almost like fashion changes over time on what boys wear and what girls wear...
I got nothing to say here.