Why do people keep insisting give STD time to grow?

For all topics regarding speculative fiction of every stripe. Otherwise known as the Geek Cave.
User avatar
Makeshift Python
Captain
Posts: 1599
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 2:37 pm

Re: Why do people keep insisting give DIS time to grow?

Post by Makeshift Python »

Yukaphile, if nobody gave TNG a chance during its troubled first season then the Trek franchise would have never grown the way it has. And as we've seen with ENTERPRISE, when the ratings plummet the studio then believes the Trek brand is no longer viable and puts it on ice indefinitely. This is why fans "boycotting" is so utterly pointless, but then again a lot of fans like those are really petty and childish. Like Star Wars fans that want the prequels erased from "canon".
User avatar
BridgeConsoleMasher
Overlord
Posts: 11637
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2018 6:18 am

Re: Why do people keep insisting give DIS time to grow?

Post by BridgeConsoleMasher »

Makeshift Python wrote: Wed Feb 27, 2019 11:11 pmLike Star Wars fans that want the prequels erased from "canon".
You know you're talking to here, right?
..What mirror universe?
User avatar
Makeshift Python
Captain
Posts: 1599
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 2:37 pm

Re: Why do people keep insisting give STD time to grow?

Post by Makeshift Python »

Harry Kim? How’s Libby?
User avatar
BridgeConsoleMasher
Overlord
Posts: 11637
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2018 6:18 am

Re: Why do people keep insisting give STD time to grow?

Post by BridgeConsoleMasher »

Makeshift Python wrote: Thu Feb 28, 2019 2:48 am Harry Kim? How’s Libby?
You really have to ask that about girlfriend of most beautiful man?
..What mirror universe?
User avatar
Admiral X
Captain
Posts: 2654
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2017 4:37 am

Re: Why do people keep insisting give STD time to grow?

Post by Admiral X »

I wouldn't mind seeing the SW prequels erased from canon, personally. The stuff hinted at in the Thrawn trilogy seemed way more interesting than what we got.
"Black care rarely sits behind a rider whose pace is fast enough."
-TR
User avatar
Yukaphile
Overlord
Posts: 8778
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2017 8:14 am
Location: Rabid Posting World
Contact:

Re: Why do people keep insisting give STD time to grow?

Post by Yukaphile »

@Makeshift Pylon That comparison is specious. Imagine if Maurice Hurley or Gene Roddenberry had stayed in charge for all seven seasons? It most definitely would have been canceled long before it reached the fourth or fifth season. Kurzman is as toxic to STD as they were to TNG. And imagine if for TNG, they said it didn't take place for Trek, but a forgotten Star Wars universe? Think people would be offended? That's the big problem with STD. They should just be honest and say it's a Kelvin Timeline show. It's a Kelvin Timeline show in everything but name, because it's a Prime Universe show in name only.
"A culture's teachings - and more importantly, the nature of its people - achieve definition in conflict. They find themselves, or find themselves lacking."
— Kreia, Knights of the Old Republic 2: The Sith Lords
User avatar
Winter
Captain
Posts: 2320
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2017 6:01 pm

Re: Why do people keep insisting give STD time to grow?

Post by Winter »

Admiral X wrote: Thu Feb 28, 2019 4:54 am I wouldn't mind seeing the SW prequels erased from canon, personally. The stuff hinted at in the Thrawn trilogy seemed way more interesting than what we got.
Frankly I find Star Wars Bounty Hunter to be more interesting then most of the Disney Star Wars Era. I mean I like Rebels but that's mostly due to the show putting character first and borrowing heavily from the Original EU. The films have been putting a lot more emphases on Effects on props then they have with any of the characters or the lore of SW. And I'm being serious about that as there more thought was put into the origin of Han's dashboard dice then Rey's backstory.

But in regards to STD I'm willing to give it at least two more shots as TNG first season was crap, season 2 was better but still not really good and Season 3 was when the show became what we know and love. Also DS9 wasn't always the great show it was as it's first season was filled with hits and misses, Move Along Home anyone, season 2 was better as was season 3 but I don't think the show really hit it's mark until season 4.

At this point I feel that Discovery is better then Enterprise but weaker then Voyager and that is based only on Season 1, still have yet to check out Season 2 though I've heard it's gotten mixed reviews. Hopefully Season 3 is when the show finally pulls it all together, only time will tell.

Back over to SW at this point TDST is just a pale imitation of TOT and now where near as good as TTT or TPT TBH. Say what you will about the Prequels but they at least laid the foundation for some great stories like The Clone Wars. Honestly the biggest flaw of the Prequels is the dialogue if that was better written I am 97.68% certain that the films would be better received. And as I've said before, many times, TDST doesn't hold a candle to TTT, Mara Jade is frankly 1000 times better then every character we have met in the films do date.
User avatar
Yukaphile
Overlord
Posts: 8778
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2017 8:14 am
Location: Rabid Posting World
Contact:

Re: Why do people keep insisting give STD time to grow?

Post by Yukaphile »

@Winter Not if Kurtzman stays on board, and he is. TNG only succeeded because they got better writers. They could have succeeded in Season 1, same as TOS, if they'd had good writers, not Gene and Maurice Hurley, from the get go. But it was Gene's revenge project, so we couldn't have that. So the myth to "give it time" is laughable. The only case that actually applies in modern in Trek is Enterprise, which actually was prompted by ratings plummeting and possible cancellation, so Berman loosened the reins and let others do their thing - and even that didn't help.
"A culture's teachings - and more importantly, the nature of its people - achieve definition in conflict. They find themselves, or find themselves lacking."
— Kreia, Knights of the Old Republic 2: The Sith Lords
User avatar
Karha of Honor
Captain
Posts: 3168
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 8:46 pm

Re: Why do people keep insisting give STD time to grow?

Post by Karha of Honor »

Yukaphile wrote: Thu Feb 28, 2019 4:57 am @Makeshift Pylon That comparison is specious. Imagine if Maurice Hurley or Gene Roddenberry had stayed in charge for all seven seasons? It most definitely would have been canceled long before it reached the fourth or fifth season. Kurzman is as toxic to STD as they were to TNG. And imagine if for TNG, they said it didn't take place for Trek, but a forgotten Star Wars universe? Think people would be offended? That's the big problem with STD. They should just be honest and say it's a Kelvin Timeline show. It's a Kelvin Timeline show in everything but name, because it's a Prime Universe show in name only.
I disagree with ceratin choices just as much even if it is in the Kelvin timeline.
Image
User avatar
Yukaphile
Overlord
Posts: 8778
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2017 8:14 am
Location: Rabid Posting World
Contact:

Re: Why do people keep insisting give STD time to grow?

Post by Yukaphile »

They should have just CALLED it a Kelvin Universe prequel. Less backlash. I've even seen people who love STD go, "Come on, bruh, this ain't the same universe that Picard and Kirk and Janeway and Sisko come from, who you fooling?"
"A culture's teachings - and more importantly, the nature of its people - achieve definition in conflict. They find themselves, or find themselves lacking."
— Kreia, Knights of the Old Republic 2: The Sith Lords
Post Reply