Americas Middle Class Massacre *sobs*

For anything and everything that's not already covered in the other forums. Except for that which is forbidden. Check the forum guidelines to make sure or risk the wrath of the warrior cobalt tarantulas!
User avatar
BridgeConsoleMasher
Overlord
Posts: 11633
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2018 6:18 am

Re: Americas Middle Class Massacre *sobs*

Post by BridgeConsoleMasher »

Draco Dracul wrote: Sun Feb 07, 2021 7:07 pm
TGLS wrote: Sun Feb 07, 2021 6:22 pm
Draco Dracul wrote: Sun Feb 07, 2021 6:05 pm
TGLS wrote: Sun Feb 07, 2021 6:00 pm
Draco Dracul wrote: Sun Feb 07, 2021 7:42 am
The question I have, if you eliminate investors, where does capital come from?
eventually it is self perpetuating as the state is wound down.
That seems congruent. State and state-like entities are good at redistributing capital. If the state is dismantled there's nothing stopping people from accumulating capital and farming said capital out to other people.
By the time the state ceases to be capital has ceased to exist because distribution is based on need rather than money.
How are you going to accomplish this? Capital is the land, the tractor and the seed to plant the next crop. It doesn't cease to exist because you eliminate a useful means of exchange.
By holding it in collective ownership and having the use of those things be determined via direct democracy.
Essentially what you need is a non-commodity bargaining portal that functions like auto-matching in network gaming.

I have the following for barter: House, car, bread
I need: computer
...Finding match...
... You can have a computer for .238 of your car or your bread and .237999 of your car
..What mirror universe?
User avatar
TexasRed
Doctor's Assistant
Posts: 123
Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2016 9:48 am

Re: Americas Middle Class Massacre *sobs*

Post by TexasRed »

GreyICE wrote: Sun Feb 07, 2021 9:50 pm
BridgeConsoleMasher wrote: Sat Feb 06, 2021 10:17 pmThat's like saying "if I drop my money in the gutter and it streams down the sewage drain, then where is the value in that as a commodity." Gamestop is recognized as a bubble and the stock market is going to patch some holes in the form of more efficient trading provision via the SEC policy etc.

In the case of Amazon, their capital funds probably aren't particularly bottlenecked. So other than your own personal investment, trying to make a difference in the world by investing in them would be very negligible just based on that. Nonetheless of course they could need more capital for whatever they're doing, and $20 is $20 + i.

In the case of you and Robinhood traders, investing your money in the stock market is actually a practical short, mid, or long term personal financial regimen, given interest has been at the floor since the meltdown.
Oh I see your misunderstanding! You think that people buy Amazon stock from Amazon! You're confusing stock and bonds.

When you buy Amazon stock you're not buying it from Amazon, and Amazon receives no money. There's no benefit to a company whatsoever when their stock is traded. It the stock goes up, it goes up. If it goes down, it goes down. The company itself remains unaffected.

This is why the stock market is such absolute cancer on American society. Many people share your misconception, and it results in them thinking what the investor class is doing is okay.
As a small investor with a personal investment account, a retirement IRA, and nearly a decade of experience in both traditional stock and crypto trading there is so much wrong with this.

Firstly the price of a stock going up is absolutely a benefit to the company that issued it. If the share price goes up it provides the company with greater capital flow and allows them to take advantage of capital offers while also increasing the value of the assets of the various share holders, and the company itself. It also creates collateral that the company can use to take out credit against. (i.e. a
collateralized loan)

Buying shares in a company also means that you literally own a portion of that company. whether it's a fraction of a single share or millions of shares you own a portion of the company equal to the size of the share ratio that you own. As a result you have the right to vote in company decisions, and the weight of your vote is based on ratio of shares that you own. I know this because I routinely receive emails informing me of upcoming board votes and asking if I have an opinion and do I wish to cast a vote.

Want an example? Apple. Apple is constantly running into trouble with government agencies, both US and foreign, when it comes to them handing over customer's private data. Now in the last few years Apple has had it's arms twisted into compliance in certain areas but generally they take a strong stand in that regard and rarely back down. Why? because that's what the shareholders voted for. I own Apple stock, not very much, but I own some regardless (They pay a fairly nice dividend).

Now you ask "well why do companies always make decisions that harm small investors and regular people" Well it's simple, the 1980's happened and in the space of a decade the US's largest industry became financials. As a direct result of this it became very hard (or perhaps frustratingly complex would be a better way to say it) for regular folks to buy, sale, and trade stock. Then comes the fintech revolution, and suddenly anyone with some patience, a willingness to learn, and has ten or fifteen bucks sitting in their account at the end of the week could suddenly get involved.

You see because of financialization up until only five years ago or so, most stock was owned by a fairly small number of people, and in turn it was these people who set the direction of the company, but now millions of millennials are flooding into the market and sucking up all the spare stock, this is why the stock market has boomed by the way (that and stock buybacks but the arguments I've seen over which has had the biggest effect are both amusing and often undecided). While the real economy has lagged, billions of dollars of spare cash and stimulus checks have been flowing into the markets. Stocks, just like any other asset are affected by supply and demand, we've been seeing a lot of asset shortages over the last ten to twelve months and as a result prices keep going up, and the number of shareholders is rapidly increasing for the first time in decades. We are witnessing history, as the old, grumpy, stick in the mud conventual traders on wallstreet are being forced to come to terms with this. They don't like it but they have no choice. Decentralized finance is here to stay and eventually wallstreet will either adapt or go extinct.

Draco Dracul
Captain
Posts: 1211
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2017 3:32 am

Re: Americas Middle Class Massacre *sobs*

Post by Draco Dracul »

BridgeConsoleMasher wrote: Mon Feb 08, 2021 6:23 pm
Draco Dracul wrote: Sun Feb 07, 2021 7:07 pm
TGLS wrote: Sun Feb 07, 2021 6:22 pm
Draco Dracul wrote: Sun Feb 07, 2021 6:05 pm
TGLS wrote: Sun Feb 07, 2021 6:00 pm
Draco Dracul wrote: Sun Feb 07, 2021 7:42 am
The question I have, if you eliminate investors, where does capital come from?
eventually it is self perpetuating as the state is wound down.
That seems congruent. State and state-like entities are good at redistributing capital. If the state is dismantled there's nothing stopping people from accumulating capital and farming said capital out to other people.
By the time the state ceases to be capital has ceased to exist because distribution is based on need rather than money.
How are you going to accomplish this? Capital is the land, the tractor and the seed to plant the next crop. It doesn't cease to exist because you eliminate a useful means of exchange.
By holding it in collective ownership and having the use of those things be determined via direct democracy.
Essentially what you need is a non-commodity bargaining portal that functions like auto-matching in network gaming.

I have the following for barter: House, car, bread
I need: computer
...Finding match...
... You can have a computer for .238 of your car or your bread and .237999 of your car
Maybe I should just stop beating around the bush about this, I'm a libertarian communist. If you need a computer, you just get a computer because production is based around what people need rather than what can be sold.
User avatar
clearspira
Overlord
Posts: 5667
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 12:51 pm

Re: Americas Middle Class Massacre *sobs*

Post by clearspira »

Draco Dracul wrote: Mon Feb 08, 2021 7:45 pm
BridgeConsoleMasher wrote: Mon Feb 08, 2021 6:23 pm
Draco Dracul wrote: Sun Feb 07, 2021 7:07 pm
TGLS wrote: Sun Feb 07, 2021 6:22 pm
Draco Dracul wrote: Sun Feb 07, 2021 6:05 pm
TGLS wrote: Sun Feb 07, 2021 6:00 pm
Draco Dracul wrote: Sun Feb 07, 2021 7:42 am
The question I have, if you eliminate investors, where does capital come from?
eventually it is self perpetuating as the state is wound down.
That seems congruent. State and state-like entities are good at redistributing capital. If the state is dismantled there's nothing stopping people from accumulating capital and farming said capital out to other people.
By the time the state ceases to be capital has ceased to exist because distribution is based on need rather than money.
How are you going to accomplish this? Capital is the land, the tractor and the seed to plant the next crop. It doesn't cease to exist because you eliminate a useful means of exchange.
By holding it in collective ownership and having the use of those things be determined via direct democracy.
Essentially what you need is a non-commodity bargaining portal that functions like auto-matching in network gaming.

I have the following for barter: House, car, bread
I need: computer
...Finding match...
... You can have a computer for .238 of your car or your bread and .237999 of your car
Maybe I should just stop beating around the bush about this, I'm a libertarian communist. If you need a computer, you just get a computer because production is based around what people need rather than what can be sold.
Libertarianism and Communism are two completely incompatible philosophies. One champions the individual, one champions the group. In fact, its so ludicrous a notion, that Wikipedia does not recognise it. I know, I just checked. Literally the only reference on Wiki I could find to this was under Anarcho-Communism.

Putting that aside, Communism does not work in real life and there is not a single example of it working anywhere beyond a few little island tribes where if you squint hard enough, perhaps, what they have is Communism. There is a reason what Capitalism is as old as human civilisation - it works, it always has worked, and will always work until we reach post-scarcity. At that point - if we reach that point - Communism has a chance. See you in a thousand years time.
Draco Dracul
Captain
Posts: 1211
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2017 3:32 am

Re: Americas Middle Class Massacre *sobs*

Post by Draco Dracul »

clearspira wrote: Mon Feb 08, 2021 8:25 pm
Draco Dracul wrote: Mon Feb 08, 2021 7:45 pm
BridgeConsoleMasher wrote: Mon Feb 08, 2021 6:23 pm
Draco Dracul wrote: Sun Feb 07, 2021 7:07 pm
TGLS wrote: Sun Feb 07, 2021 6:22 pm
Draco Dracul wrote: Sun Feb 07, 2021 6:05 pm
TGLS wrote: Sun Feb 07, 2021 6:00 pm
Draco Dracul wrote: Sun Feb 07, 2021 7:42 am
The question I have, if you eliminate investors, where does capital come from?
eventually it is self perpetuating as the state is wound down.
That seems congruent. State and state-like entities are good at redistributing capital. If the state is dismantled there's nothing stopping people from accumulating capital and farming said capital out to other people.
By the time the state ceases to be capital has ceased to exist because distribution is based on need rather than money.
How are you going to accomplish this? Capital is the land, the tractor and the seed to plant the next crop. It doesn't cease to exist because you eliminate a useful means of exchange.
By holding it in collective ownership and having the use of those things be determined via direct democracy.
Essentially what you need is a non-commodity bargaining portal that functions like auto-matching in network gaming.

I have the following for barter: House, car, bread
I need: computer
...Finding match...
... You can have a computer for .238 of your car or your bread and .237999 of your car
Maybe I should just stop beating around the bush about this, I'm a libertarian communist. If you need a computer, you just get a computer because production is based around what people need rather than what can be sold.
Libertarianism and Communism are two completely incompatible philosophies. One champions the individual, one champions the group. In fact, its so ludicrous a notion, that Wikipedia does not recognise it. I know, I just checked. Literally the only reference on Wiki I could find to this was under Anarcho-Communism.
Libertarianism traditionally referred to lib left ideologies like anarcho-communism (the lib in lib left is libertarian not liberal as liberalism as an ideology is explicitly capitalist). Personally I feel that the best way to champion the individual is to champion the group as if everyone in the group is provided for each individual in that group is more free, in particular it means that things like automation give everyone else greater prosperity rather than leading to the greater wealth for some and poverty for far more.
Putting that aside, Communism does not work in real life and there is not a single example of it working anywhere beyond a few little island tribes where if you squint hard enough, perhaps, what they have is Communism. There is a reason what Capitalism is as old as human civilisation - it works, it always has worked, and will always work until we reach post-scarcity. At that point - if we reach that point - Communism has a chance. See you in a thousand years time.
We have reached post-scarcity, at least for most basic needs like food, but scarcity is artificially maintained for profit. About half of all food produced is just thrown away.

Hell in the US we have something like 5 vacant houses for every homeless person.
Fuzzy Necromancer
Overlord
Posts: 6311
Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2017 1:57 am

Re: Americas Middle Class Massacre *sobs*

Post by Fuzzy Necromancer »

Clearspira, Capitalism is not as old as human civilization. Capitalism is the social system that came after Feudalism. And most failed communist states tended to happen because they got the shit bombed or sanctioned out of them by capitalist states.
"Believe me, there’s nothing so terrible that someone won’t support it."
— Un Lun Dun, China Mieville
Draco Dracul
Captain
Posts: 1211
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2017 3:32 am

Re: Americas Middle Class Massacre *sobs*

Post by Draco Dracul »

Fuzzy Necromancer wrote: Mon Feb 08, 2021 8:55 pm Clearspira, Capitalism is not as old as human civilization. Capitalism is the social system that came after Feudalism. And most failed communist states tended to happen because they got the shit bombed or sanctioned out of them by capitalist states.
Sure Socialism could work in theory, but in practice any government that tries it gets overthrown by the CIA.
User avatar
clearspira
Overlord
Posts: 5667
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 12:51 pm

Re: Americas Middle Class Massacre *sobs*

Post by clearspira »

Fuzzy Necromancer wrote: Mon Feb 08, 2021 8:55 pm Clearspira, Capitalism is not as old as human civilization. Capitalism is the social system that came after Feudalism. And most failed communist states tended to happen because they got the shit bombed or sanctioned out of them by capitalist states.
The Mesopotamians were using money 7000 years ago. We have found actual accounts that detail the goods traded. Sounds like capitalism to me. Any difference between that and today sounds like splitting hairs frankly.
Draco Dracul
Captain
Posts: 1211
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2017 3:32 am

Re: Americas Middle Class Massacre *sobs*

Post by Draco Dracul »

clearspira wrote: Mon Feb 08, 2021 9:14 pm
Fuzzy Necromancer wrote: Mon Feb 08, 2021 8:55 pm Clearspira, Capitalism is not as old as human civilization. Capitalism is the social system that came after Feudalism. And most failed communist states tended to happen because they got the shit bombed or sanctioned out of them by capitalist states.
The Mesopotamians were using money 7000 years ago. We have found actual accounts that detail the goods traded. Sounds like capitalism to me. Any difference between that and today sounds like splitting hairs frankly.
If has money is all that's needed to be capitalism, then by your own definition communism has never even been attempted.
User avatar
clearspira
Overlord
Posts: 5667
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 12:51 pm

Re: Americas Middle Class Massacre *sobs*

Post by clearspira »

Draco Dracul wrote: Mon Feb 08, 2021 9:01 pm
Fuzzy Necromancer wrote: Mon Feb 08, 2021 8:55 pm Clearspira, Capitalism is not as old as human civilization. Capitalism is the social system that came after Feudalism. And most failed communist states tended to happen because they got the shit bombed or sanctioned out of them by capitalist states.
Sure Socialism could work in theory, but in practice any government that tries it gets overthrown by the CIA.
You seem to be confusing communism and socialism. They're not the same thing. Universal healthcare is not ''communism''. An unemployment safety net is not ''communism''.

Socialism actually works very well.
Post Reply