https://www.sfdebris.com/videos/stargate/sg1s6e07.php
I liked this better than most clip shows; there was plenty of importance to the episode to keep my attention. And Hammond got a chance to shine a bit for political skill by ending the chess game with his trump card (I'm not a metaphor purist).
I always found the ability of the Stargate program to maintain secrecy to be a bit unbelievable. I think I was supposed to just accept it and move on, like faster than light travel. There was a planned direct to DVD movie, Stargate: Revolution, that would have included the program going public, but that (and Stargate Atlantis: Extinction) were canceled due to various financial factors.
When Colonel Chekov (tell me that name was a coincidence) wasn't defending Russia from interstellar threats he moonlighted as Gary Chalk, VA for Optimus Primal. And Prince Rutherford, fan of smashing.
SG-1: DIsclosure
Re: SG-1: DIsclosure
I love Disclosure for the final scene of Thor flexing on Kinsey.
"Supreme Commander."
That said I'm kind of a mixed feeling about the episode itself. It doesn't do a great job establishing that SGC isnt a bunch of fuck ups. And it's kinda telling that ultimately their out is having Thor flex on everyone present. Like 3 of the people present didn't know aliens existed till an hour ago. Of course they'll be cowed when one of them shows up and all but gives Hammond a handjob while flexing his impressive title.
"Supreme Commander."
That said I'm kind of a mixed feeling about the episode itself. It doesn't do a great job establishing that SGC isnt a bunch of fuck ups. And it's kinda telling that ultimately their out is having Thor flex on everyone present. Like 3 of the people present didn't know aliens existed till an hour ago. Of course they'll be cowed when one of them shows up and all but gives Hammond a handjob while flexing his impressive title.
- CrypticMirror
- Captain
- Posts: 926
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 2:15 am
Re: SG-1: DIsclosure
SG1 shows how the trap of covert operations work. You start out keeping something secret, for good reasons. Or not even actively hiding it, just nobody noticing it, then that becomes the norm and you start spending time ensuring it is the norm, reassuring everyone around you it is the norm, and gradually doing something extra each time exposure threatens.
Eventually you have this whole apparatus built around hiding it, and a fair amount of ego invested in being allowed to hide, and all the time there is this little voice going "people are gonna be real mad when they find out", which of course they will. And this thing you've hid for all the best reasons starts becoming a millstone around your neck that you start fearing disclosing not because people couldn't handle the information, but because you fear they are gonna be so mad at you for hiding it for so long. And it is even worse if the secret is something you inherited from someone else, which is where Stargate ends up with Beau Bridge's general and the President with the chipmunk smile whose names I cannot remember and don't want to look up. This terrible secret war, and they still think they have to keep it secret because they don't want to be the ones people all get mad at.
It is a pretty good depiction of the vicious cycle that state secrets are. That is why they are supposed to time-out and be released into the public domain regularly [every thirty-fifty years] but sometimes the secrets are so bad, and the people who want to keep them secret have so much ego invested in hiding them, that they continue to remain classified. And that is bad for democracy. In the SG1verse, it is even worse than the normal governmental shenanigans too. They should have gone public long before it reached that point. But secrecy begets secrecy, I guess.
Although relying on the X-Filesian need for humans to decry conspiracy theories and not believe in aliens was the dumbest form of opsec they ever did imagine. Jeez.
Edit: As for it being a clip show, well as The Simpsons once said "Sorry for another crappy clipshow".
Eventually you have this whole apparatus built around hiding it, and a fair amount of ego invested in being allowed to hide, and all the time there is this little voice going "people are gonna be real mad when they find out", which of course they will. And this thing you've hid for all the best reasons starts becoming a millstone around your neck that you start fearing disclosing not because people couldn't handle the information, but because you fear they are gonna be so mad at you for hiding it for so long. And it is even worse if the secret is something you inherited from someone else, which is where Stargate ends up with Beau Bridge's general and the President with the chipmunk smile whose names I cannot remember and don't want to look up. This terrible secret war, and they still think they have to keep it secret because they don't want to be the ones people all get mad at.
It is a pretty good depiction of the vicious cycle that state secrets are. That is why they are supposed to time-out and be released into the public domain regularly [every thirty-fifty years] but sometimes the secrets are so bad, and the people who want to keep them secret have so much ego invested in hiding them, that they continue to remain classified. And that is bad for democracy. In the SG1verse, it is even worse than the normal governmental shenanigans too. They should have gone public long before it reached that point. But secrecy begets secrecy, I guess.
Although relying on the X-Filesian need for humans to decry conspiracy theories and not believe in aliens was the dumbest form of opsec they ever did imagine. Jeez.
Edit: As for it being a clip show, well as The Simpsons once said "Sorry for another crappy clipshow".
- clearspira
- Overlord
- Posts: 5670
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 12:51 pm
Re: SG-1: DIsclosure
We live in a society in which its first thought when faced with Covid-19 was to strip stores clean. And people think that we would be ready for the knowledge that aliens that can steal our bodies want to wipe us off the planet. Uh-huh.CrypticMirror wrote: ↑Mon Sep 07, 2020 7:09 pm SG1 shows how the trap of covert operations work. You start out keeping something secret, for good reasons. Or not even actively hiding it, just nobody noticing it, then that becomes the norm and you start spending time ensuring it is the norm, reassuring everyone around you it is the norm, and gradually doing something extra each time exposure threatens.
Eventually you have this whole apparatus built around hiding it, and a fair amount of ego invested in being allowed to hide, and all the time there is this little voice going "people are gonna be real mad when they find out", which of course they will. And this thing you've hid for all the best reasons starts becoming a millstone around your neck that you start fearing disclosing not because people couldn't handle the information, but because you fear they are gonna be so mad at you for hiding it for so long. And it is even worse if the secret is something you inherited from someone else, which is where Stargate ends up with Beau Bridge's general and the President with the chipmunk smile whose names I cannot remember and don't want to look up. This terrible secret war, and they still think they have to keep it secret because they don't want to be the ones people all get mad at.
It is a pretty good depiction of the vicious cycle that state secrets are. That is why they are supposed to time-out and be released into the public domain regularly [every thirty-fifty years] but sometimes the secrets are so bad, and the people who want to keep them secret have so much ego invested in hiding them, that they continue to remain classified. And that is bad for democracy. In the SG1verse, it is even worse than the normal governmental shenanigans too. They should have gone public long before it reached that point. But secrecy begets secrecy, I guess.
Although relying on the X-Filesian need for humans to decry conspiracy theories and not believe in aliens was the dumbest form of opsec they ever did imagine. Jeez.
Edit: As for it being a clip show, well as The Simpsons once said "Sorry for another crappy clipshow".
Time once again for my favourite Men in Black quote: ''A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals, and you know it! ''
- clearspira
- Overlord
- Posts: 5670
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 12:51 pm
Re: SG-1: DIsclosure
The problem as I see it is that Kinsey perpetually raises excellent points from the perspective of an outsider. SG-1 constantly makes serious mistakes, their whole operation is a money sink, it WAS convenient that Daniel suddenly started foretelling an invasion just after he threatened to close them down, and they often did not have much to show for the effort as they never seemed to keep any of the technology that they found and their alien allies all had prime directives.Ghilz wrote: ↑Mon Sep 07, 2020 6:39 pm I love Disclosure for the final scene of Thor flexing on Kinsey.
"Supreme Commander."
That said I'm kind of a mixed feeling about the episode itself. It doesn't do a great job establishing that SGC isnt a bunch of fuck ups. And it's kinda telling that ultimately their out is having Thor flex on everyone present. Like 3 of the people present didn't know aliens existed till an hour ago. Of course they'll be cowed when one of them shows up and all but gives Hammond a handjob while flexing his impressive title.
And the writers know this which is why they first made him a religious fundamentalist and then a true villain as opposed to merely being an antagonist. All to discredit the fact that he was wrong only in hindsight.
- Rocketboy1313
- Captain
- Posts: 1127
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 6:17 pm
Re: SG-1: DIsclosure
I think this was the first episode of "Stargate SG-1" I ever saw.
I know clip shows are looked down on by long term fans that keep up on things, but this definitely gave me so much information to jump into the series with I was able to appreciate everything moving forward.
Even all the earth political machinations struck me as super interesting.
I know clip shows are looked down on by long term fans that keep up on things, but this definitely gave me so much information to jump into the series with I was able to appreciate everything moving forward.
Even all the earth political machinations struck me as super interesting.
My Blog: http://rocketboy1313.blogspot.com/
My Twitter: https://twitter.com/Rocketboy1313
My Tumblr: https://www.tumblr.com/blog/rocketboy1313
My Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/13rocketboy13
My Twitter: https://twitter.com/Rocketboy1313
My Tumblr: https://www.tumblr.com/blog/rocketboy1313
My Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/13rocketboy13
Re: SG-1: DIsclosure
Jules-Pierre Mao wants to reveal alien technology to the world and not keep it secret? No way!
Also, I have a feeling the Chinese ambassador's attitude was supposed to be joke of sorts from the writers, I wonder how many times did they had to redo those scenes because no one could keep a straight face. And Russia being a rational actor, this really feels odd nowadays, doesn't it?
And I have agree with a comment 2 posts above me, the world learning about aliens and alien technology that would violate God knows how many treaties and laws would probably cause unimaginable chaos, especially as the COVID-19 pandemic has shown, people aren't are rational and will all too often take very stupid decisions, often very short-sighted ones.
Also, I have a feeling the Chinese ambassador's attitude was supposed to be joke of sorts from the writers, I wonder how many times did they had to redo those scenes because no one could keep a straight face. And Russia being a rational actor, this really feels odd nowadays, doesn't it?
And I have agree with a comment 2 posts above me, the world learning about aliens and alien technology that would violate God knows how many treaties and laws would probably cause unimaginable chaos, especially as the COVID-19 pandemic has shown, people aren't are rational and will all too often take very stupid decisions, often very short-sighted ones.
Re: SG-1: DIsclosure
Yeah. Though this problem will reach its peak during Atlantis, where everyone who points out Atlantis' fuck ups (The Asurans, Michael, Kavanagh, The NID, Woolsey) are all 100% right. Especially when it comes to Weir in particular.clearspira wrote: ↑Mon Sep 07, 2020 8:53 pmGhilz wrote: ↑Mon Sep 07, 2020 6:39 pm I love Disclosure for the final scene of Thor flexing on Kinsey.
"Supreme Commander."
That said I'm kind of a mixed feeling about the episode itself. It doesn't do a great job establishing that SGC isnt a bunch of fuck ups. And it's kinda telling that ultimately their out is having Thor flex on everyone present. Like 3 of the people present didn't know aliens existed till an hour ago. Of course they'll be cowed when one of them shows up and all but gives Hammond a handjob while flexing his impressive title.
The problem as I see it is that Kinsey perpetually raises excellent points from the perspective of an outsider. SG-1 constantly makes serious mistakes, their whole operation is a money sink, it WAS convenient that Daniel suddenly started foretelling an invasion just after he threatened to close them down, and they often did not have much to show for the effort as they never seemed to keep any of the technology that they found and their alien allies all had prime directives.
And the writers know this which is why they first made him a religious fundamentalist and then a true villain as opposed to merely being an antagonist. All to discredit the fact that he was wrong only in hindsight.
- CrypticMirror
- Captain
- Posts: 926
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 2:15 am
Re: SG-1: DIsclosure
I can't agree with that. It all comes down to how people are told. The problem right now is that for the last twenty years we've had a press [especially here in the UK] which enjoys creating hysteria, and governments who see perpetual hysteria as the way to maintain its own position. I am old enough to remember when the press and the government, as much as I still despised them, actively worked to calm rather than inflame. If the press started treating people like adults instead of whipping up the mob, then I think people would accept it. I've seen when people worked calmly and together in the face of some pretty horrid things[from government] and I know that hoarding all the toilet paper and burying their "beans" in the woods is not the only mode people have. There will always be loud panicky fools, but most people are good. I've seen the best in people, it exists.clearspira wrote: ↑Mon Sep 07, 2020 8:46 pmWe live in a society in which its first thought when faced with Covid-19 was to strip stores clean. And people think that we would be ready for the knowledge that aliens that can steal our bodies want to wipe us off the planet. Uh-huh.CrypticMirror wrote: ↑Mon Sep 07, 2020 7:09 pm SG1 shows how the trap of covert operations work. You start out keeping something secret, for good reasons. Or not even actively hiding it, just nobody noticing it, then that becomes the norm and you start spending time ensuring it is the norm, reassuring everyone around you it is the norm, and gradually doing something extra each time exposure threatens.
Eventually you have this whole apparatus built around hiding it, and a fair amount of ego invested in being allowed to hide, and all the time there is this little voice going "people are gonna be real mad when they find out", which of course they will. And this thing you've hid for all the best reasons starts becoming a millstone around your neck that you start fearing disclosing not because people couldn't handle the information, but because you fear they are gonna be so mad at you for hiding it for so long. And it is even worse if the secret is something you inherited from someone else, which is where Stargate ends up with Beau Bridge's general and the President with the chipmunk smile whose names I cannot remember and don't want to look up. This terrible secret war, and they still think they have to keep it secret because they don't want to be the ones people all get mad at.
It is a pretty good depiction of the vicious cycle that state secrets are. That is why they are supposed to time-out and be released into the public domain regularly [every thirty-fifty years] but sometimes the secrets are so bad, and the people who want to keep them secret have so much ego invested in hiding them, that they continue to remain classified. And that is bad for democracy. In the SG1verse, it is even worse than the normal governmental shenanigans too. They should have gone public long before it reached that point. But secrecy begets secrecy, I guess.
Although relying on the X-Filesian need for humans to decry conspiracy theories and not believe in aliens was the dumbest form of opsec they ever did imagine. Jeez.
Edit: As for it being a clip show, well as The Simpsons once said "Sorry for another crappy clipshow".
Time once again for my favourite Men in Black quote: ''A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals, and you know it! ''
Now that I can agree with. I don't know if it was intentional, in fact I'd bet it wasn't, but it really came off as a deep critique of the whole post 9/11 paradigm. Whenever they resorted to post 9/11 tactics of abuse, torture, and deception as first resort it always resulted in a fuckup which made things worse. On the rare occasions they tried actual diplomacy or at least gaining informed consent, then it tended to work out better. Which is often how real life works too.
Re: SG-1: DIsclosure
Not even what I mean. Like, my issue with, for example, Michael, isn't "Oh, what they are doing is inhumane", My issue is "They are unwilling to commit to what they are doing". So they end end up sorta treating Michael like a person even though none of them sees him as such, in something that is ultimately doomed to failure and literally causes Michael to escape. Had they left him in a cell like a lab subject, he'd never have broken out, and the countless people he killed would be fine. But the show can't commit to the main characters doing monstrous things for a greater purpose, so they sort of do half measures all the time.CrypticMirror wrote: ↑Mon Sep 07, 2020 9:38 pmNow that I can agree with. I don't know if it was intentional, in fact I'd bet it wasn't, but it really came off as a deep critique of the whole post 9/11 paradigm. Whenever they resorted to post 9/11 tactics of abuse, torture, and deception as first resort it always resulted in a fuckup which made things worse. On the rare occasions they tried actual diplomacy or at least gaining informed consent, then it tended to work out better. Which is often how real life works too.
A lot of the Atlantis' Flaws is from this weird double dipping where "We want them to toe the line" but "we can't risk them being the villains". IE: Lets use an Asuran as a double door against his people, Michael, etc....