Neelix rebrands fossil fuels as Molecules of Freedom

This is for topical issues effecting our fair world... you can quit snickering anytime. Note: It is the desire of the leadership of SFDebris Conglomerate that all posters maintain a civil and polite bearing in this forum, regardless of how you feel about any particular issue. Violators will be turned over to Captain Janeway for experimentation.
User avatar
ProfessorDetective
Captain
Posts: 1466
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2019 3:40 pm
Location: Oak Ridge, TN, USA

Re: Neelix rebrands fossil fuels as Molecules of Freedom

Post by ProfessorDetective »

Antiboyscout wrote: Mon Jun 03, 2019 1:13 am
Darth Wedgius wrote: Sun Jun 02, 2019 7:24 pm I hear China is working on a molten salt reactor, maybe LFTR (Liquid Flouride Thorium Reactor). I've had my reservations around LFTR, but some people, including some very smart, knowledgeable ones, swear it's the affordable, clean energy source we've been waiting for, and could "burn" some nuclear wastes, including the actinides that are some of the most dangerous waste products of current reactors.
When the environmentalist movement finally get's their collective heads out of their asses and start supporting Nuclear instead of wanting it all shut down, we will live in a better world and I might start supporting them somewhat.
I personally only support it as a stopgap until we can get battery tech in a decent place to make the renewables more practical.

Like I said before, it's still better than the fossil fuels.
User avatar
Riedquat
Captain
Posts: 1897
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2017 12:02 am

Re: Neelix rebrands fossil fuels as Molecules of Freedom

Post by Riedquat »

ProfessorDetective wrote: Mon Jun 03, 2019 8:25 am
Antiboyscout wrote: Mon Jun 03, 2019 1:13 am
Darth Wedgius wrote: Sun Jun 02, 2019 7:24 pm I hear China is working on a molten salt reactor, maybe LFTR (Liquid Flouride Thorium Reactor). I've had my reservations around LFTR, but some people, including some very smart, knowledgeable ones, swear it's the affordable, clean energy source we've been waiting for, and could "burn" some nuclear wastes, including the actinides that are some of the most dangerous waste products of current reactors.
When the environmentalist movement finally get's their collective heads out of their asses and start supporting Nuclear instead of wanting it all shut down, we will live in a better world and I might start supporting them somewhat.
I personally only support it as a stopgap until we can get battery tech in a decent place to make the renewables more practical.

Like I said before, it's still better than the fossil fuels.
I don't see much point in renewables other than a stopgap until we can get enough nuclear reactors built (which in turn should be a stopgap until fusion arrives, but I'll believe that when I see it, which is unlikely to happen unless I live to 500).
Post Reply