And since they said "all the shows," Zora from Discovery comes to mind, and then of course the whole first season of Picard was about friendly AIs and people's prejudices against them.
Star Trek: Prodigy
- Durandal_1707
- Captain
- Posts: 790
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 1:24 am
Re: Star Trek: Prodigy
Re: Star Trek: Prodigy
New episode has a huge callback to TOS and a race that calls themselves the "Enderprizians".
I love this show!
I love this show!
It's OK to make mistakes as long as you don't make the same ones. If you do then you're not learning.
- CharlesPhipps
- Captain
- Posts: 4953
- Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2017 8:06 pm
Re: Star Trek: Prodigy
That was a genuinely good Star Trek episode, adult or child.
Re: Star Trek: Prodigy
The new episode has Okona, minus an eye I wonder why, and ends on a cliffhanger...
Was not expecting that!
Was not expecting that!
It's OK to make mistakes as long as you don't make the same ones. If you do then you're not learning.
Re: Star Trek: Prodigy
Not particularly, but then again I'm not exactly enthusiastic about the level of AI and automation we've got now. With what they've got in Trek there shouldn't be anyone on board ships who actually does anything to the running and operation of the ship.
Anyway AI makes a handy villain that doesn't tread on anyone's toes.
- Frustration
- Captain
- Posts: 1607
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 8:16 pm
Re: Star Trek: Prodigy
That bothered me with The Orville - the idea that a human pilot's skill should make any difference seems ridiculous. It goes beyond their actively using humans instead of automation; it's using a slow and stupid human to perform functions that the computer could manage faster and ought to manage better.
"Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two equals four. If that is granted, all else follows." -- George Orwell, 1984
- BridgeConsoleMasher
- Overlord
- Posts: 11636
- Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2018 6:18 am
Re: Star Trek: Prodigy
Well you've never had to plant subspace mines on Cardassian ships in a nebula.Frustration wrote: ↑Thu Nov 17, 2022 9:57 pm That bothered me with The Orville - the idea that a human pilot's skill should make any difference seems ridiculous. It goes beyond their actively using humans instead of automation; it's using a slow and stupid human to perform functions that the computer could manage faster and ought to manage better.
..What mirror universe?
-
- Captain
- Posts: 3741
- Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2019 2:22 pm
Re: Star Trek: Prodigy
Then repeat to yourself 'It's just a show, I should really just relax.'Frustration wrote: ↑Thu Nov 17, 2022 9:57 pm That bothered me with The Orville - the idea that a human pilot's skill should make any difference seems ridiculous. It goes beyond their actively using humans instead of automation; it's using a slow and stupid human to perform functions that the computer could manage faster and ought to manage better.
- Frustration
- Captain
- Posts: 1607
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 8:16 pm
Re: Star Trek: Prodigy
The shows I like are capable of meeting a higher standard than that. With occasional exceptions.
"Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two equals four. If that is granted, all else follows." -- George Orwell, 1984
Re: Star Trek: Prodigy
There is an constant idea that a human pilot can make better decisions than a computer can. Or off the cuff ones at least. That is a basic premise of a human versus a AI one at least. Doing something that an AI would not have thought of due to some inherit risk or low probability of success sort of thing.Frustration wrote: ↑Thu Nov 17, 2022 9:57 pm That bothered me with The Orville - the idea that a human pilot's skill should make any difference seems ridiculous. It goes beyond their actively using humans instead of automation; it's using a slow and stupid human to perform functions that the computer could manage faster and ought to manage better.
The sort of probability that would think would be in the 0.001% range but yet the human won over the AI.
I got nothing to say here.