TNG: Sins of the Father

This forum is for discussing Chuck's videos as they are publicly released. And for bashing Neelix, but that's just repeating what I already said.
Nobody700
Captain
Posts: 576
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2019 12:58 pm

Re: TNG: Sins of the Father

Post by Nobody700 »

CharlesPhipps wrote: Tue Apr 02, 2024 11:56 am
MightyDavidson wrote: Mon Jan 01, 2024 9:10 pm=

Which is probably why it's such an awful film. Or one of the major contributing factors.
The book about the making of the film suggests that it was a lot more about how the fact that the crew actually got conned and all of the special effects budget embezzled with more ambitious scripts as well as shots all taken away. I mean, the script was awful and Shatner was protected from editors but they could have done much better if they'd had more time as well as had gone with their original established people.
Frankly while it didn't help, lets not pretend these special effects may have even been good! For all we know, they would have looked like claymation... and not the fun way.
Science Fiction is a genre where anything can happen. Just make sure what happens is enjoyable for yourself and your audience.
User avatar
CharlesPhipps
Captain
Posts: 4953
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2017 8:06 pm

Re: TNG: Sins of the Father

Post by CharlesPhipps »

Nobody700 wrote: Wed Apr 03, 2024 12:18 am
Frankly while it didn't help, lets not pretend these special effects may have even been good! For all we know, they would have looked like claymation... and not the fun way.
To be fair, they wanted to hire Lucas' Industrial Light and Magic (ironic choice that may be) but ended up hiring a guy who worked out of his garage.
User avatar
McAvoy
Captain
Posts: 3906
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2019 3:55 am
Location: East Windsor, NJ

Re: TNG: Sins of the Father

Post by McAvoy »

CharlesPhipps wrote: Wed Apr 03, 2024 3:29 am
Nobody700 wrote: Wed Apr 03, 2024 12:18 am
Frankly while it didn't help, lets not pretend these special effects may have even been good! For all we know, they would have looked like claymation... and not the fun way.
To be fair, they wanted to hire Lucas' Industrial Light and Magic (ironic choice that may be) but ended up hiring a guy who worked out of his garage.
Well they ended up doing the next movie.
I got nothing to say here.
User avatar
Madner Kami
Captain
Posts: 4055
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2017 2:35 pm

Re: TNG: Sins of the Father

Post by Madner Kami »

McAvoy wrote: Wed Apr 03, 2024 3:52 am
CharlesPhipps wrote: Wed Apr 03, 2024 3:29 am
Nobody700 wrote: Wed Apr 03, 2024 12:18 am
Frankly while it didn't help, lets not pretend these special effects may have even been good! For all we know, they would have looked like claymation... and not the fun way.
To be fair, they wanted to hire Lucas' Industrial Light and Magic (ironic choice that may be) but ended up hiring a guy who worked out of his garage.
Well they ended up doing the next movie.
ILM did the effects of Star Trek 2, 3, 4 and 6, as well as Farpoint, Generations and First Contact.
"If you get shot up by an A6M Reisen and your plane splits into pieces - does that mean it's divided by Zero?
- xoxSAUERKRAUTxox
Post Reply