Dr Ford still inundated with death threats

[Karha of Honor]

So you think the MSM is paying women to lie... seriously... talk about paranoid conspiracies. Maybe something like Fox News would do that. But I don't think any other source, left or right, would.

They would but i don't think they do as a habit.

[Worffan101]

I sure as hell believe a serial liar who can't even bother to come up with CONVINCING bullshit when he's on national TV and instead resorts to hysterical rants is lying like the dog he is when he claims he isn't a rapist.

Absent physical evidence (after all, the incident took place decades ago), Kavanaugh simply didn't act like an innocent man. An INNOCENT man would've said, "take all the time you need, investigate this without time limits, the truth will vindicate me". That's how genuinely innocent suspects ACT in real-life criminal cases. A guilty man, meanwhile, blusters, attacks the credibility of the accuser, and tries to make emotional appeals while subtly attempting to avoid investigation.

Kavanaugh acts like a man with something to hide, and given that he's been caught lying to Congress before and even a little bit of research reveals that he's completely unfit for the job he was being interviewed for, yeah, I believe that he's scum, a mean drunk, an alcoholic, probably beats his wife when he's drunk, and is a serial sexual abuser. I can't trust a single word that comes out of his mouth.

An innocent man who believed that the opposition was operating in good faith would probably do that. And if emotional appeals disqualify a side, then the side backing the accusers lost all credibility some time ago.

As a side note, were you this outraged when Clinton was in office? Or is this selective outrage?

No, actually, he WOULDN'T. Take it from my cousin the public defender and my mother the ex-paralegal, innocent people insist that the evidence is on their sides if you care to look, guilty people attack the accuser.

When Clinton was in office, I was too busy being gestated, learning how to talk, and discovering the wonderful world of dinosaurs to give a shit about politics. These days, I think he's an overrated blowhard who should keep his damn mouth shut and his dick in his pants, and he's going to hell for signing DOMA, the craven little coward.

[Yukaphile]

I still appreciate what he did for us in the 1990s, though. The US still had problems, but it felt as if we were at our most utopian, peace-loving as we could ever possibly get. The Cold War was over, seemingly, our military was at its lowest alert, we weren't involved in any wars past Operation Desert Storm, arguably the cleanest military strike in history, and the economy was doing well. Lots of people had money and you just didn't get shit like mass shooters going deranged and butchering kids back then. And then the MSM covers them, they get lots of publicity and that inspires another sick fuck to try and get his 15 minutes of infamy. Hell, I think the only mass shooting was Columbine. That's it. Now it's happening every other week or month with alarming frequency, and regressives are trying to turn the clock back on women's rights or voting rights, and those in power are trying to manipulate us by pointing fingers at an enemy to "otherize" to unite the people in a shared hatred while they work behind the scenes to pass laws that will restrict their rights and steal more money for the uber rich. I hate the 21st century. It sucks.

[Darth Wedgius]

If they legitimately gave a shit about the child, they'd wanna make sure they came out to a happy world, but their economic policies have been shit since Reagan and just lead to more poverty, which doesn't breed happy children.

Are you against bank robbery? Is it fair to be against bank robbery but not willing to give would-be robbers the cash they want?

Plus these hardcore Christians just hate the idea of women having sex and enjoying it, and people just having sex period. They are really regressives from another era who belong in the 4th century in terms of how sexually enlightened they are.
...
They get off on the idea of forced birth. It honestly in some ways feels like a kink to them.

That doesn't apply to any Christians I know. Maybe it's just what you want to believe, so you can feel justified hating people you already want to hate?

[Darth Wedgius]

I sure as hell believe a serial liar who can't even bother to come up with CONVINCING bullshit when he's on national TV and instead resorts to hysterical rants is lying like the dog he is when he claims he isn't a rapist.

Absent physical evidence (after all, the incident took place decades ago), Kavanaugh simply didn't act like an innocent man. An INNOCENT man would've said, "take all the time you need, investigate this without time limits, the truth will vindicate me". That's how genuinely innocent suspects ACT in real-life criminal cases. A guilty man, meanwhile, blusters, attacks the credibility of the accuser, and tries to make emotional appeals while subtly attempting to avoid investigation.

Kavanaugh acts like a man with something to hide, and given that he's been caught lying to Congress before and even a little bit of research reveals that he's completely unfit for the job he was being interviewed for, yeah, I believe that he's scum, a mean drunk, an alcoholic, probably beats his wife when he's drunk, and is a serial sexual abuser. I can't trust a single word that comes out of his mouth.

An innocent man who believed that the opposition was operating in good faith would probably do that. And if emotional appeals disqualify a side, then the side backing the accusers lost all credibility some time ago.

As a side note, were you this outraged when Clinton was in office? Or is this selective outrage?

No, actually, he WOULDN'T. Take it from my cousin the public defender and my mother the ex-paralegal, innocent people insist that the evidence is on their sides if you care to look, guilty people attack the accuser.

You've never heard of innocent people filing counter-suits? Ask your cousin and mother about those.

When Clinton was in office, I was too busy being gestated, learning how to talk, and discovering the wonderful world of dinosaurs to give a shit about politics.

That's the problem with zygotes these days, no civic involvement.

[Robovski]

Words are cheap and plentiful. Evidence is not.

[Fuzzy Necromancer]

If they legitimately gave a shit about the child, they'd wanna make sure they came out to a happy world, but their economic policies have been shit since Reagan and just lead to more poverty, which doesn't breed happy children.

Are you against bank robbery? Is it fair to be against bank robbery but not willing to give would-be robbers the cash they want?

Plus these hardcore Christians just hate the idea of women having sex and enjoying it, and people just having sex period. They are really regressives from another era who belong in the 4th century in terms of how sexually enlightened they are.
...
They get off on the idea of forced birth. It honestly in some ways feels like a kink to them.

That doesn't apply to any Christians I know. Maybe it's just what you want to believe, so you can feel justified hating people you already want to hate?

Then you need to meet more Christians. The ones I met at outfest and outside Planned Parenthood didn't seem very nice.

[Worffan101]

I sure as hell believe a serial liar who can't even bother to come up with CONVINCING bullshit when he's on national TV and instead resorts to hysterical rants is lying like the dog he is when he claims he isn't a rapist.

Absent physical evidence (after all, the incident took place decades ago), Kavanaugh simply didn't act like an innocent man. An INNOCENT man would've said, "take all the time you need, investigate this without time limits, the truth will vindicate me". That's how genuinely innocent suspects ACT in real-life criminal cases. A guilty man, meanwhile, blusters, attacks the credibility of the accuser, and tries to make emotional appeals while subtly attempting to avoid investigation.

Kavanaugh acts like a man with something to hide, and given that he's been caught lying to Congress before and even a little bit of research reveals that he's completely unfit for the job he was being interviewed for, yeah, I believe that he's scum, a mean drunk, an alcoholic, probably beats his wife when he's drunk, and is a serial sexual abuser. I can't trust a single word that comes out of his mouth.

An innocent man who believed that the opposition was operating in good faith would probably do that. And if emotional appeals disqualify a side, then the side backing the accusers lost all credibility some time ago.

As a side note, were you this outraged when Clinton was in office? Or is this selective outrage?

No, actually, he WOULDN'T. Take it from my cousin the public defender and my mother the ex-paralegal, innocent people insist that the evidence is on their sides if you care to look, guilty people attack the accuser.

You've never heard of innocent people filing counter-suits? Ask your cousin and mother about those.

When Clinton was in office, I was too busy being gestated, learning how to talk, and discovering the wonderful world of dinosaurs to give a shit about politics.

That's the problem with zygotes these days, no civic involvement.

I am well aware of the concept of counter-suits, sir. In the environment of a criminal trial for a lower-income person, or a job interview for a lazy bourgeois toady like Kavanaugh, such things are effectively not part of the equation. I refer SOLELY to the behavior of the accused and its bearing on the statistical likelihood of the guilt of said party.

[Worffan101]

Also, the first POTUS I was old enough to give a rat's ass about was Bush, and that was right about when people started to realize what a damn idiot he is and just how badly he screwed the pooch on basically every element of policy. (so, 2004-2005; I would've been about 8)

[Admiral X]

The reason why Dr. Ford didn't charge him is simple. She doesn't wanna be in the same room with him. Hell, I've seen people argue that you could test DNA from rapists decades ago. With that logic, we shouldn't believe WWII victims stepping forward. After all, they could get the semen on them from their rapist tested and hunt him down in Russia to get their justice, right? But then, do you really think those older women, especially if they were brutalized by more than one horny and drunk man as a CHILD, is going to wanna see them again? Even that possibility will have them short on air and feeling triggered. You really don't understand psychology at all, do you?

This idea that women are plotting liars constantly scheming on how to overthrow and destroy men is a frankly hateful and offensive stereotype that just needs to die. It's been a stereotype since Shakespeare's time.

Dr. Ford's intention was completely transparent from the outset, and her own witnesses failing to even give corroborating testimony only sealed it. Anyone with a half a brain could tell this was entirely political from the start, with only those suffering from doublethink having any real trouble grasping this.