I thought the Prime Directive was mainly concerned with the inhabitants not knowing about the federation. It's about not influencing a change in their societal development.Makeshift Python wrote: ↑Mon Dec 24, 2018 7:05 pm It's funny how Spock is telling Kirk not to come and rescue him so not to "violate" the PD, while he was already doing that anyway by setting the ice bomb in that volcano.
Star Trek: Into Darkness
- BridgeConsoleMasher
- Overlord
- Posts: 11636
- Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2018 6:18 am
Re: Star Trek: Into Darkness
..What mirror universe?
- Makeshift Python
- Captain
- Posts: 1599
- Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 2:37 pm
Re: Star Trek: Into Darkness
Pike basically takes the Picard stance over Kirk's decisions with the volcano.BridgeConsoleMasher wrote: ↑Mon Dec 24, 2018 9:32 pmI thought the Prime Directive was mainly concerned with the inhabitants not knowing about the federation. It's about not influencing a change in their societal development.Makeshift Python wrote: ↑Mon Dec 24, 2018 7:05 pm It's funny how Spock is telling Kirk not to come and rescue him so not to "violate" the PD, while he was already doing that anyway by setting the ice bomb in that volcano.
"You were supposed to survey a planet, not alter it's destiny."
- CharlesPhipps
- Captain
- Posts: 4953
- Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2017 8:06 pm
Re: Star Trek: Into Darkness
Star Trek was always actually fairly consistent that Captains had a lot of leeway to do what they needed or felt was right. The big issue I saw here was that Kirk altered his logs, which meant he was trying to deceive his superiors.Makeshift Python wrote: ↑Mon Dec 24, 2018 7:05 pm It's funny how Spock is telling Kirk not to come and rescue him so not to "violate" the PD, while he was already doing that anyway by setting the ice bomb in that volcano.
I'm inclined to think Marcus wouldn't give a shit normally or at least it would be a wrist slapping offense.
- Makeshift Python
- Captain
- Posts: 1599
- Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 2:37 pm
Re: Star Trek: Into Darkness
You mean Pike?
- CharlesPhipps
- Captain
- Posts: 4953
- Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2017 8:06 pm
Re: Star Trek: Into Darkness
No, Pike is very clearly of the mind Kirk should have followed the PD.
- BridgeConsoleMasher
- Overlord
- Posts: 11636
- Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2018 6:18 am
Re: Star Trek: Into Darkness
FINEMakeshift Python wrote: ↑Tue Dec 25, 2018 1:32 amPike basically takes the Picard stance over Kirk's decisions with the volcano.BridgeConsoleMasher wrote: ↑Mon Dec 24, 2018 9:32 pmI thought the Prime Directive was mainly concerned with the inhabitants not knowing about the federation. It's about not influencing a change in their societal development.Makeshift Python wrote: ↑Mon Dec 24, 2018 7:05 pm It's funny how Spock is telling Kirk not to come and rescue him so not to "violate" the PD, while he was already doing that anyway by setting the ice bomb in that volcano.
"You were supposed to survey a planet, not alter it's destiny."
..What mirror universe?
Re: Star Trek: Into Darkness
And now, 7 pages into the thread, the review is finally publicly viewable.
https://sfdebris.com/videos/startrek/film12.php
https://sfdebris.com/videos/startrek/film12.php
-
- Captain
- Posts: 1047
- Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2018 5:47 pm
Re: Star Trek: Into Darkness
That was some pretty good analysis! Only real question I had was "where's the score?", lol.
Re: Star Trek: Into Darkness
By definition of being a Christmas show, I think it would be a 0. Annoying Character is probably won by Kirk, and a Burn, Baby, Burn trophy to the Vengeance.
Re: Star Trek: Into Darkness
My thoughts. So many missed opportunities.
I don't need to go into why this movie disappointed me. Others including Chuck have gone over so many of them they don't need repeating.
Points I liked. Someone violating the prime directive for moral reasons. Kirk calling out Pike that his attitude is why he got the Enterprise in the first place. It kinda was. And Kirk examining the evidence and following the villain's plot moments before the ambush. This was Kirk showing the tactical genius he is supposed to have. Let his brief foresight allow him to save Marcus. Let him reason out why the villain went to Qonos. (Steal a ship to fake an attack on the Federation to begin a war.)
Sorry I got off on a disappointment there.
Other thing I liked. SEATBELTS!
I don't need to go into why this movie disappointed me. Others including Chuck have gone over so many of them they don't need repeating.
Points I liked. Someone violating the prime directive for moral reasons. Kirk calling out Pike that his attitude is why he got the Enterprise in the first place. It kinda was. And Kirk examining the evidence and following the villain's plot moments before the ambush. This was Kirk showing the tactical genius he is supposed to have. Let his brief foresight allow him to save Marcus. Let him reason out why the villain went to Qonos. (Steal a ship to fake an attack on the Federation to begin a war.)
Sorry I got off on a disappointment there.
Other thing I liked. SEATBELTS!