Two more victims of the war on drugs

This is for topical issues effecting our fair world... you can quit snickering anytime. Note: It is the desire of the leadership of SFDebris Conglomerate that all posters maintain a civil and polite bearing in this forum, regardless of how you feel about any particular issue. Violators will be turned over to Captain Janeway for experimentation.
Post Reply
User avatar
Admiral X
Captain
Posts: 2654
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2017 4:37 am

Two more victims of the war on drugs

Post by Admiral X »

‘They Did Not Deal Drugs’: Neighbors of Slain Couple Who Shot 4 Cops Refute Official Story

The Cops Were the Aggressors in This Week's Deadly Houston Drug Raid

So the TL;DR of this is that the Houston Police played this off as a fairly typical drug raid but fudged some of the details until they were called on it. Those details being that the officers who broke their way into this couple's home were not in uniform, that almost immediately they killed the family's dog (and thus fired first), and that only after this happened did the woman try to disarm the man who killed their dog as the others gunned her down, while the man went back to their bedroom to retrieve a pistol and tried to defend himself against what he probably thought was a home invasion. He actually managed to shoot 4 of them before they killed him, but they were wearing body armor and the shots did not penetrate. They've played themselves off as heroes for killing these people in spite of not finding any of the drugs their "informant" said was there (the claim was that it was a heroin drug house), and the neighbors aren't having any of it.

Conveniently, none of the officers involved had body cams, and they seized the security footage from a neighbor's house as "evidence."
"Black care rarely sits behind a rider whose pace is fast enough."
-TR
User avatar
Zoinksberg
Officer
Posts: 198
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2018 1:23 pm

Re: Two more victims of the war on drugs

Post by Zoinksberg »

Sounds pretty standard. Police don't wear clear identification when serving such warrants because it makes them a target, dogs are considered dangerous so killed indiscriminately, and judges pass out these kind of no-knock warrants like candy with incredibly low thresholds for cause.

It's really something that in a state where Castle Doctrine is a given and killing armed intruders is considered a right, if not an outright duty, that law enforcement conducts themselves in such a manner.
User avatar
BridgeConsoleMasher
Overlord
Posts: 11630
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2018 6:18 am

Re: Two more victims of the war on drugs

Post by BridgeConsoleMasher »

Zoinksberg wrote: Fri Feb 01, 2019 7:03 pm Sounds pretty standard. Police don't wear clear identification when serving such warrants because it makes them a target, dogs are considered dangerous so killed indiscriminately, and judges pass out these kind of no-knock warrants like candy with incredibly low thresholds for cause.

It's really something that in a state where Castle Doctrine is a given and killing armed intruders is considered a right, if not an outright duty, that law enforcement conducts themselves in such a manner.
Yep. Only thing I'm curious about is the false reporting. I'm sure this kind of thing has come to attention before, so what's the social reaction?
..What mirror universe?
User avatar
Admiral X
Captain
Posts: 2654
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2017 4:37 am

Re: Two more victims of the war on drugs

Post by Admiral X »

So far it seems to be pretty negative. The first article is all about how the neighbors are coming out and contradicting the police story that these two were dealers, and the police are getting pretty defensive about it, like always.
"Black care rarely sits behind a rider whose pace is fast enough."
-TR
Fuzzy Necromancer
Overlord
Posts: 6303
Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2017 1:57 am

Re: Two more victims of the war on drugs

Post by Fuzzy Necromancer »

"Believe me, there’s nothing so terrible that someone won’t support it."
— Un Lun Dun, China Mieville
Post Reply