And with shows like Game of Thrones viewers have a Much better understanding of Politics then they did 20 years ago... Oh my god The Phantom Menace is 20 years old.FaxModem1 wrote: ↑Sat May 11, 2019 6:15 am The politics aren't that bad, just not as properly explored as they could have been. Looking back, the Republic is already looking pretty doomed, due to things like mega-corporations such as the Trade Federation having blatant senate representation. That just shows how little people's rights are respected.
As well, showing how little the Republic senate respects parliamentary procedure, as any voice in the Senate can interrupt a motion on the floor, silencing those in peril. Queen Amidala can't even voice her grievances before she is silenced by those with real power, the rich and the wealthy elites. Palpatine may have purposely overturned the apple cart for his own personal ambitions, but the apples were already rotting if swift action wasn't taken to fix all this.
I see this now, after having studied Political Science, and I think it should have been explained better in film language, like Anakin asking Padme's bodyguard why aren't they letting her talk or something, so that it's more obvious to the audience, but it's definitely there to see.
Anyways, with GOT, B5 and hell even kid shows like Avatar, The Legend of Korra, Steven Universe and Adventure Time have all had an increase in the use of Politics in their storytelling and as I said at the start, some of that Politics being even more boring sounding then Trade Routes in TPM. True as TV shows they have more time to flesh out their ideas but honestly I think the Prequels do a pretty good job at exploring the ideas it presents.
Like you said the ideas are interesting and there to see but at the time audiences of 1999 just weren't didn't understand Politics in fiction like we do today. It helps that many lines are more relevant today then they were at the time. Padme's line "I was not elected to watch my people suffer and die while you discuss this invasion in a committee!" has, I think, a lot more weight behind it then people give it credit for.