DS9 - The House of Quark

This forum is for discussing Chuck's videos as they are publicly released. And for bashing Neelix, but that's just repeating what I already said.
User avatar
Mecha82
Captain
Posts: 1794
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2019 12:42 am
Location: Finland

Re: DS9 - The House of Quark

Post by Mecha82 »

Yukaphile wrote: Tue Jun 18, 2019 4:59 am Nope, we live for the Emperor, WE DIE FOR THE EMPEROR!
It is our duty. Only in death does duty end.
"In the embrace of the great Nurgle, I am no longer afraid, for with His pestilential favour I have become that which I once most feared: Death.."
- Kulvain Hestarius of the Death Guard
drewder
Officer
Posts: 229
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2017 1:45 am

Re: DS9 - The House of Quark

Post by drewder »

clearspira wrote: Sat Jun 15, 2019 4:04 pm I have often wondered how such 19th century sexism survived into the 24th century. Women are not allowed a seat on the council? They are not allowed to even run a House? These women are essentially Amazons! They should make the Suffragettes look like children in the havoc they would cause trying to get equal rights. Why have these warrior women not gone to war against the men? And unlike human women in the 19th century, Klingon women are allowed to serve as soldiers; they have guns and bombs and Bat'Leths and are crewing warships.

At least with the Ferengi women they are trapped naked indoors with zero access to influence and firearms. That is not true with Klingon women. Sorry but Duras sisters aside they really do not seem to be making all that much of an effort despite having plenty of opportunity.
Why sexism survived? Because the universe was created by Gene "no women captain's" Roddenberry. Seriously in my mind his supposed forward thinking progressivism amounts to having access to as many sexual partners as possible in as mant combinations as possible or as the vulcans say "Infinite Diversity in Infinite Combinations"
User avatar
Yukaphile
Overlord
Posts: 8778
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2017 8:14 am
Location: Rabid Posting World
Contact:

Re: DS9 - The House of Quark

Post by Yukaphile »

Because he literally said "you can't trust women" because he was all butthurt over his wife leaving him over his endless affairs - that he was to blame for. Seriously, Roddenberry was far from the "liberal utopia visionary" his hardcore fanatics like to think he is.
"A culture's teachings - and more importantly, the nature of its people - achieve definition in conflict. They find themselves, or find themselves lacking."
— Kreia, Knights of the Old Republic 2: The Sith Lords
User avatar
Wargriffin
Captain
Posts: 570
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 9:17 pm

Re: DS9 - The House of Quark

Post by Wargriffin »

rickgriffin wrote: Sat Jun 15, 2019 6:35 pm There was another point I considered that Chuck didn't point out--why did D'Ghor, who ostensibly ACTUALLY KNEW the ins and outs of the Klingon honor system, not even hesitate to try and strike down Quark, but every other klingon there knew exactly what was going on? Chuck says it was just cause he was blinded by greed--and that is likely a big part of it but I think there's something even deeper there:

Because to klingons, "ferengi" is practically a synonym for dishonorable. D'Ghor at that moment was not considering the looks of his actions, because his instinct was to automatically presume Quark was equivalent to a fully dishonorable enemy and the only needed action was to put him down like a dog. And it didn't matter what Quark said, what could a ferengi say that'd make himself, whose nature is dishonor, honorable?

But the council wasn't really concerned with some nebulous "nature". They're used to judging based on actions, as very likely they've seen plenty of klingons act both honorably and dishonorably. Quark doesn't have some powerful name pulling the strings to make the council look the other way, and neither does D'Ghor. So the only thing that really mattered to the council at that moment was the actions taken before them, whether or not they were performed by a ferengi.

D'Ghor may have in the moment forgotten his place as Klingons do have codes they uphold NO MATTER what

as in Reunion, where a Formally Dishonored Worf is allowed to barge onto Duras' vessel and demand a duel to the Death due to the Klingon Right of Vengeance, Duras claims he has no rights but The moment Worf makes it clear he is doing this to avenge his mate, NO ONE argues with him, even Duras can only demand a weapon cause even a Klingon who has been officially unperson'd has the Right to Vengeance

So yeah Ferengi or not Quark acting in proper form making it very clear he is willing to die for standing by his accusation and D'ghor jumping at the first chance to kill him
"When you rule by fear, your greatest weakness is the one who's no longer afraid."
User avatar
Mecha82
Captain
Posts: 1794
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2019 12:42 am
Location: Finland

Re: DS9 - The House of Quark

Post by Mecha82 »

Yukaphile wrote: Tue Jun 18, 2019 11:04 am Because he literally said "you can't trust women" because he was all butthurt over his wife leaving him over his endless affairs - that he was to blame for. Seriously, Roddenberry was far from the "liberal utopia visionary" his hardcore fanatics like to think he is.
He was flawed human being with less than admirable traits but then again none of us are perfect.
"In the embrace of the great Nurgle, I am no longer afraid, for with His pestilential favour I have become that which I once most feared: Death.."
- Kulvain Hestarius of the Death Guard
User avatar
BridgeConsoleMasher
Overlord
Posts: 11520
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2018 6:18 am

Re: DS9 - The House of Quark

Post by BridgeConsoleMasher »

drewder wrote: Tue Jun 18, 2019 10:51 am
clearspira wrote: Sat Jun 15, 2019 4:04 pm I have often wondered how such 19th century sexism survived into the 24th century. Women are not allowed a seat on the council? They are not allowed to even run a House? These women are essentially Amazons! They should make the Suffragettes look like children in the havoc they would cause trying to get equal rights. Why have these warrior women not gone to war against the men? And unlike human women in the 19th century, Klingon women are allowed to serve as soldiers; they have guns and bombs and Bat'Leths and are crewing warships.

At least with the Ferengi women they are trapped naked indoors with zero access to influence and firearms. That is not true with Klingon women. Sorry but Duras sisters aside they really do not seem to be making all that much of an effort despite having plenty of opportunity.
Why sexism survived? Because the universe was created by Gene "no women captain's" Roddenberry. Seriously in my mind his supposed forward thinking progressivism amounts to having access to as many sexual partners as possible in as mant combinations as possible or as the vulcans say "Infinite Diversity in Infinite Combinations"
In other words, he's completely on point with his question. It is a questionable element in a story that's purposefully depicting sexism of another species.
Power laces... alright.
Fianna
Captain
Posts: 674
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2018 3:46 pm

Re: DS9 - The House of Quark

Post by Fianna »

D'Ghor is a dishonorable Klingon. And like many dishonorable people, he probably believed that everyone else is just as dishonorable as he is, and (like him) are only following a code of honor because of the penalties for violating it.

When Quark presents himself to be killed, under the explicit rules of the Klingon honor code, D'Ghor is absolutely allowed to kill him. He doesn't understand that trying to kill Quark violates the spirit their honor code, because he doesn't really believe in the code's spirit, nor does he expect anyone else in the room to give a fig about it, either.
User avatar
excalibur
Officer
Posts: 289
Joined: Fri May 05, 2017 1:55 pm
Location: USA

Re: DS9 - The House of Quark

Post by excalibur »

I can't wait for a follow up review with "looking for par mach in the wrong place"
"Adapt, Overcome & Improvise"

Image
"There's a fine line between not listening and not caring...I like to think I walk that line everyday of my life."
User avatar
BridgeConsoleMasher
Overlord
Posts: 11520
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2018 6:18 am

Re: DS9 - The House of Quark

Post by BridgeConsoleMasher »

Fianna wrote: Tue Jun 18, 2019 11:29 pm D'Ghor is a dishonorable Klingon. And like many dishonorable people, he probably believed that everyone else is just as dishonorable as he is, and (like him) are only following a code of honor because of the penalties for violating it.

When Quark presents himself to be killed, under the explicit rules of the Klingon honor code, D'Ghor is absolutely allowed to kill him. He doesn't understand that trying to kill Quark violates the spirit their honor code, because he doesn't really believe in the code's spirit, nor does he expect anyone else in the room to give a fig about it, either.
That's way off base.
Power laces... alright.
User avatar
Madner Kami
Captain
Posts: 3961
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2017 2:35 pm

Re: DS9 - The House of Quark

Post by Madner Kami »

BridgeConsoleMasher wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2019 4:14 am
Fianna wrote: Tue Jun 18, 2019 11:29 pm D'Ghor is a dishonorable Klingon. And like many dishonorable people, he probably believed that everyone else is just as dishonorable as he is, and (like him) are only following a code of honor because of the penalties for violating it.

When Quark presents himself to be killed, under the explicit rules of the Klingon honor code, D'Ghor is absolutely allowed to kill him. He doesn't understand that trying to kill Quark violates the spirit their honor code, because he doesn't really believe in the code's spirit, nor does he expect anyone else in the room to give a fig about it, either.
That's way off base.
Naturally, given the episode is mostly playing on Kling, not DS9.
"If you get shot up by an A6M Reisen and your plane splits into pieces - does that mean it's divided by Zero?
- xoxSAUERKRAUTxox
Post Reply