Star Trek Discovery: Season Three

For all topics regarding speculative fiction of every stripe. Otherwise known as the Geek Cave.
User avatar
Asvarduil
Officer
Posts: 185
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2017 8:03 pm

Re: Star Trek Discovery: Season Three

Post by Asvarduil »

clearspira wrote: Thu Jan 07, 2021 8:21 pm
Asvarduil wrote: Thu Jan 07, 2021 5:29 pm
At the end, I loved the callout to a Starbase with a gelato machine - someone clearly watches Lore Reloaded too! I'm glad the proud Federation tradition of installing gelato machines has continued even into the disconnected future of the Federation.
Are you serious? Did that actually happen? I hate pandering shit like this. And you just know that whoever wrote it was tittering like a little schoolgirl too.
Trust me when I say that, BY FAR that is the least stupid thing about how this season wrapped up. Hell, a shot of an honest-to-God Starfleet gelato machine would've just put the metaphorical cherry on top.

Seriously though, the last 5 minutes are so full of pounding the reset button, you'd think the writers went to Warp 10 and had a space-salamander orgy on the panel housing said reset button.

It's not as bad as Picard coming back as a robot, or time-traveling space nazis, but it's in a comfy 3rd place IMO.
User avatar
Asvarduil
Officer
Posts: 185
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2017 8:03 pm

Re: Star Trek Discovery: Season Three

Post by Asvarduil »

Mabus wrote: Thu Jan 07, 2021 7:13 pm Forgot to mention that the show skips showing Stamets confronting Michael for tossing him off the ship to prevent him from jumping to the radioactive nebula, to Stamets being on the bridge and being happy that Michael is promoted to captain (MajorGrin pointed that out in his review video).
I guess they kind of forgot about that little plot... even though Stamets appears in the episode for 1 minute and gets put on another ship, against his protests. Oops.
Honestly, and as noted above - the last 5 minutes of S3E12 were a whirlwind of stupid/failed plot points. I noticed, but it's almost not worth mentioning compared to all the other idiocy. It's at least plausible that, with Hugh having survived and Burnham's Advanced Fastball Special being successful, that he'd grudgingly agree to forgive Burnham.
Zargon
Officer
Posts: 210
Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2019 6:36 pm

Re: Star Trek Discovery: Season Three

Post by Zargon »

Well, end of season 3....and Michael saves the universe again!

*So we start off with the cliffhanger where Starfleet attacks the Discovery. And...wow, suddenly, for no reason Discovery is now the super duper most all powerful god ship in the whole universe. All of Starfleet could not even make a dent in the shields. Too bad Discovery was not so all powerful last episode.

*And wow, them bad guys..er..somehow fixed Discovery shields up to like 1000%, right? When dumb Tilly gave up the ship, they had no shields or weak shields Good thing the bad guys know how to fix the ship better then the whole useless crew.

*And the bad guys know the Starbases Dumb Death Star Weakness......but why does not Starfleet know all Discovery's weakness(oh right the all powerful ship has no weaknesses right?)

*And, er, of course the show must have the "big battle", so sure the Nvar show up....but, um, did they spore jump across the universe?

*And Ossyra is read to use...er...pesticide and shoot it in the...er open windows on the space ships? Wow...did an idiot write that or what.... Saying the weak Politically Correct word "pesticide" is such a joke...guess the poor wimpy writer did not want to talk about real weapons of mass destruction and real chemical warfare.

*So dumb Tilly and her useless pals can't do anything with out Michael? They had tons of time to sabotage the ship and did nothing.

*And all the "Sphere Data" can do is possess cute little Star Wars like robots...awww, and then 'pew pew' the bad guys until the get blown up? So...what happened to all that super all powerful Sphere Information? Maybe something like a awesome program to regain control of the ship?

*And so to escape.....sigh.....Michael actives the Quarantine Force Field. The super all powerful military grade "quarantine field" that can stop anything....

*And the bad guys shut off only the air to the lower decks, but as the writer is dumb they forget about life support. So....why does not the Dumb Squad go get in space suits? Or a shuttle?

*Guess the dumb writer did not know about things like Starships can release sleep gas to knock out people....or did the bad guys think that was too easy?

*And as Tilly and the rest of her Dumb Squad sure are lucky Michael told them what to do : make a cool awesome bomb and blow up the nacelle.

*Bit of a side note, but why did not the 32nd century docs fix Demeters ugly half borg face?

*And one of the worst things about this show is how fake it is: WHY could we have not seen the Tilly birthday episode? We get endless crap, but they could not show us that?

*Though the dumb writer strikes again as they don't know that nacelles can be ejected : It's LITERATELY half the reason Starfleet ships have them back off the hull of the ship.

*And the Other African American Woman can hold her breath 10 minutes? 10 minutes? Is she a mutant or half lung fish or something?

*And that inside elevator bit was cool, right? But...um...WHY were there SO many elevators in motion? Were all the bad guys joyriding around in all the elevators?

*And...um...Ossyra pushes Michael into the wall goo data whatever....and thinks that what...kills her? Then she just stands there as is a target so Michael can win?

*Then everyone fusses all over Michael and tell her how great she is...sigh.

*Then Michael gets the DUMBEST IDEA EVER....one that has been used in WAY to many modern Star Trek shows written by bad writers: "lets toss the Warp Core at it!!!!!" This is beyond dumb. Why do so many writers think tossing the engine at a problem is such a great thing. Like if your car was stuck in a ditch would you pop the hood and throw the engine at the dirt hoping the explosion would push the car out of the ditch?

*Why is Discovery's warp core so deep in the hull? In any other Starfleet ship it's right at the bottom.

*And Book can talk to the Spores....sigh.

And "I don't need no air" lady lives....lame writer can't even kill off a non main character.

But, oh no, cute sphere data robot....er....goes off line for no reason? Awww...how cute!

*And gosh all the "baby" in the ship stuff is horrible.

*Nice of the crashed ship to stay intact JUST long enough for discovery to come back .

*So the 125 year old broken malfunctioning computer can READ MINDS and...er....project imaginary lovers into holo bodies? What....

*And Saru leaves to play dad.....well, good by second worst captain in Starfleet ever

*And more bad writing....so Starfleet starts to mine the ONE Dillithum planet. Ok? So....that will last for what? A couple weeks? One planet can't fill the needs of a whole galaxy....so, what is the Celebrate.?

*And Michlae finnaly gets to be REALLY captain...even though she rules the whole universe anyway


But, at least it's over......
Zatman
Officer
Posts: 58
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2019 11:31 pm

Re: Star Trek Discovery: Season Three

Post by Zatman »

Mabus wrote: Thu Jan 07, 2021 7:13 pm Forgot to mention that the show skips showing Stamets confronting Michael for tossing him off the ship to prevent him from jumping to the radioactive nebula, to Stamets being on the bridge and being happy that Michael is promoted to captain (MajorGrin pointed that out in his review video).
I guess they kind of forgot about that little plot... even though Stamets appears in the episode for 1 minute and gets put on another ship, against his protests. Oops.
I wouldn't say he's happy. He's standing there, I think he clapped, but the closeup of his face most definitely does not show him smiling. A ghost of a smile appears right when the camera cuts to him, but it's at best one of those smiles you plaster on when you're in a situation that requires you to smile, but you don't want to.
User avatar
Link8909
Captain
Posts: 579
Joined: Thu May 21, 2020 6:39 pm
Location: Kent, England
Contact:

Re: Star Trek Discovery: Season Three

Post by Link8909 »

Asvarduil wrote: Thu Jan 07, 2021 5:29 pm At last, I am ready.

This final arc of S3 Discovery was decent, but not perfect, in my opinion. While there's a lot to love, I can't sit here and say it was well thought-through, either.

Frankly, I think the plot with Saru was the strong point, as it was the most character-oriented part of the piece, which is where Discovery really shines (when it chooses to. BOFFs.) Having So'kal come to terms with his reality was very powerful, and frankly made the action-y (and worse, video-game-y sequence in DISCO's turbolifts) seem lackluster, because they were lackluster.
I agree on this, when Discovery focuses on characters like Gray being seen for the first time since his death, and Captain Saru helping So'kal come to terms with his trauma, it always shines and personally is Star Trek at its finest, but the action is very lacklustre, we see the return of the camera crane spinning around in an establishing shot which I didn't miss (although I did like the reveal of the Monster in the Holodeck, that was cool), and the return of Turbolift shafts that were apparently made with Time Lord Science as it makes the Discovery look far bigger than it's suppose to be, but I got a good laugh from Book doing a Sparta on Zareh when getting his second wind after he insulted Grudge.
Asvarduil wrote: Thu Jan 07, 2021 5:29 pm I had to agree with the Admiral when he had Stamets evacuated. He was right, that Michael made the right call in evacuating Stamets. While I will happily riff on Michael making bad decisions, I won't riff on two things: A) Michael tends to make better decisions in crisis moments, and B) Whatever else is wrong with Michael, she tends to act from a place of love and compassion (even if she does it stupidly). I don't feel like it was ever in doubt she'd at least try to save the away team.
While I don't go as far as calling her stupid, I'd defiantly describe her as impulsive, and it's very much out of a place of love and compassion as you said, and it looks like during to corse of this season she's learned to control this behaviour, still somewhat of a maverick like busting Book out of Sickbay, but able to made smart decisions like getting Stamets off Discovery.

Speaking of whom, I'm looking forward to seeing more of a fallout to this, we've gotten a tase of it with some understandable death glares from Paul, but I definitely thing this friendship has been broken like a Kit-Kat.
Asvarduil wrote: Thu Jan 07, 2021 5:29 pm Speaking of the away team, a stupid moment: Grey Tal becomes a hologram because...(Asvarduil blows a raspberry). While we know that the original Voyager constantly read brainwaves, I don't think that century old, degrading Federation tech wouldn't be able to translate the trippy nature of Adira's joined nature, into a hologram of her deceased lover.
This is definitely ridiculous, and I have no idea how this happened, but I personally don't mind simply because the emotional moment of Gray finally being able to interact with others was perfect and heartwarming.
Asvarduil wrote: Thu Jan 07, 2021 5:29 pm Additionally, something else I consider stupid: Apparently, all Discovery ever needed was a Space Druid to control the spore drive - in fact, Commune with Nature is all that was needed to navigate the spore drive! While I don't mind Discovery having a high-level Druid on the crew, I think that it's awful convenient that Book is able to control the Spore Drive. Of course, it's the season finale, and I interpret the whole plot point as the result of the writers writing themselves into a corner, while also probably allowing for Stamets' actor a chance to move on. It feels contrived and poorly-considered, which even as good as S3 has been, is still a hallmark of Discovery's writing.
That's fair, I didn't mind this as much because it was established from the start that Book could communicate with living things telepathically, and given how the Spore Drive works it makes sense that he could operate it by communicating with the Mycelium (as crazy as that sounds even with the context), and this opens up a new avenue for replicating the Spore Dive.
Asvarduil wrote: Thu Jan 07, 2021 5:29 pm Speaking of. "We can now mine the Dilithium planet." Uhmmm...that nebula utterly f@#$s shields! Also, the interesting selling point of the season was that Dilithium was an endangered species. I think that hitting the metaphorical reset button was a mistake for the setting - keeping Dilithium inaccessible would've made a strong hook for Season 4. Additionally, the alternate path of perfecting and proliferating DASH technology could've been taken. Alas, it wasn't. The writers were clearly up against their cosmic deadline.
I get this, I personally would have liked Dilithium to have remained scarce and the Spore Dive have been the replacement and have that bee the status quo, and I do see how this is the series trying to rap up the story of season three, there are interesting implications for the future however, the Federation now has a monopoly on Dilithium, and while I'm sure that they'll share it with others, it does open up potential conflict with other factions.

As for how they're able to mine it, I'm sure that now Aurellio is a true believer, he'll have divided a way to quickly extracted it, and I hope we see this in season four.
Asvarduil wrote: Thu Jan 07, 2021 5:29 pm "The chain fell apart after Osyraa's death". A case of a wasted villain - literally! Osyraa was interesting, because as violent as she was, she was also willing to exercise soft power, in her proferred merger with the Federation. I think dialing down her moustache-twirlingly evil tendencies, and making her a more Dukat-like villain would've been stronger. Alas, the green woman is dead.
I definitely agree on this, Osyraa had a lot of interesting aspects to her that made her a great villain, her relationship with Aurellio, her plan to merge the Emerald Chain with the Federation, and her ruthlessness and cunningness with dealing with people like how she got into Federation Headquarters, and her simply cutting Life Support to stop the bridge crew, so her being killed off is definitely a waist of potential.

I personally would have liked her to be taken prisoner only later for her to escape and fight another day.
"I think, when one has been angry for a very long time, one gets used to it. And it becomes comfortable like…like old leather. And finally… it becomes so familiar that one can't remember feeling any other way."

- Jean-Luc Picard
User avatar
Link8909
Captain
Posts: 579
Joined: Thu May 21, 2020 6:39 pm
Location: Kent, England
Contact:

Re: Star Trek Discovery: Season Three

Post by Link8909 »

Asvarduil wrote: Thu Jan 07, 2021 5:29 pm Asvarduil's Season 3 Conclusion
All things considered, DISCO S3 is - by and far - the best season of Discovery yet, but I'd say it's still slightly worse than Enterprise Season 3. Despite the strides made by DISCO standards the story is still reasonably weak, with Burnham being insufferable in the first half, Detmer's C-plot being out-and-out disrespectful to the realities of PTSD, and the finale's plot being wrapped up in what is frankly an unstatisfying way. One can say, "Aah but at least it didn't end with time-traveling space nazis!" which, is a point I can only grant, but it's still damnation by faint praise.

Giving the BOFFs more screentime, and diminishing Burnham's role were the two strong things this season did. Additionally, the ruined future of the 32nd century was a great and intriguing setting that was ripe for drama. Had the writers not rushed to hit the reset button, they could've kept much of the drama intact for future seasons, which would've allowed for HUGE diversity of storytelling and plot.

Tilly also notably grew this season. I don't think we've seen the last of Tilly commanding Discovery, though - this outing was rough, and I'd say was her Kobayashi Maru moment. She encountered the unwinnable scenario head-on; she's survived a scenario that was unfair from the start. From here, I believe she'll not only be a better engineer, but a better person and officer.

Lastly, Adira was a great addition to the roster this season. She contributed as the wunderkind, without being a pain in the ass about it. Even her unusual Trill situation added contrast to the story, and was used sparingly enough to be a good detail.

I want to see Burnham grow into a more responsible persona in DISCO S4. I want to see the Federation's woes not be instantly fixed, but for the effort to rebuild the Federation to continue - it was seriously destroyed by The Burn, and should not just automatically weld itself together overnight. I want to see the Chain remnants return, only with a more long-running and cunning villain, if we have to have one. Above all, I want the BOFFs to take the spotlight - Owosekun is by far the most fleshed-out, which is good, but not great. Detmer needed a stronger arc, and Rhys is an untapped source of awesome.
For me personally season three is far better than Enterprises third season, simply because that season was 26 episodes of the characters being angry, bitter, and miserable, and just nonstop depression and hopelessness, Discovery has a lot more hopefulness to it and great characters that personally make me want to watch it more that Enterprise.

I do feel that they should touch on Detmer's PTSD in the future, as after her You Say Run moment in "The Sanctuary" it wasn't brought up again.

Other than that I pretty much agree, the entire cast was great and I love that the bridge crew where given even more of a presence, Saru as a Captain and Tilly being a First Officer was great and I hope we get more of that, the new setting is wonderful and creative, and I look forward to more in season four.

And to answer the question that Chuck proposed at the end of his season two review, was this more of the same, and I personally feel that it's no, but yes.

Michael Burnham and her role in the series I feel is a great improvement from the last seasons, she's still the lead, but she doesn't dominate the series, she has her story arc, but not everything is about her, it's far more balanced out, and I do look forward to seeing her grow more as she's now the Captain of Discovery.

The overall story arc is also a far more interesting one as well, its high stakes, but not ridiculously large, the Burn had come and gone and there's nothing to change that, and if Osyraa had gotten the Dilithium it would have simply meant that the status quo of her dominance would continue in the galaxy, overall the stakes felt more personal as well, and in the end the way to prevent events from repeating was not through some tech-tech solution or a explosion fest battle, but simply helping someone who was isolated with connecting with the outside.

Which is something I love about this season, it's overall theme of reconnection people that was present in every episode, this was a consistent story with a meaning full message, which is espeshally needed nowadays.

But, there are still things that can be improve upon, the series still relies on really out there science in it's stories like with how the Burn happened, and while I personally don't mind because I was emotionally invested in Su'Kal's plight and how Saru helped him, it's still something that doesn't make sense that's going to rustle someone's jimmies.

Overall, I'd say season three of Discovery was great and I enjoyed it, much like season two, the creative team looked at what wasn't working from last season and tried to improve upon the series while not dismissing what had come before and building upon it instead, and I look forward to seeing what will be improve upon in season four and onwards.
"I think, when one has been angry for a very long time, one gets used to it. And it becomes comfortable like…like old leather. And finally… it becomes so familiar that one can't remember feeling any other way."

- Jean-Luc Picard
User avatar
Mabus
Captain
Posts: 521
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2017 11:37 am

Re: Star Trek Discovery: Season Three

Post by Mabus »

Zatman wrote: Fri Jan 08, 2021 4:05 am
Mabus wrote: Thu Jan 07, 2021 7:13 pm Forgot to mention that the show skips showing Stamets confronting Michael for tossing him off the ship to prevent him from jumping to the radioactive nebula, to Stamets being on the bridge and being happy that Michael is promoted to captain (MajorGrin pointed that out in his review video).
I guess they kind of forgot about that little plot... even though Stamets appears in the episode for 1 minute and gets put on another ship, against his protests. Oops.
I wouldn't say he's happy. He's standing there, I think he clapped, but the closeup of his face most definitely does not show him smiling. A ghost of a smile appears right when the camera cuts to him, but it's at best one of those smiles you plaster on when you're in a situation that requires you to smile, but you don't want to.
Maybe "happy" was an oversimplification, but he had no issue looking at Burnham while she entered the bridge, it does feel like he pretty much got forced to be there. I mean, it would have been better to have a short scene showing Michael trying to reconcile with Stamets, or Culbert trying to ease Stamets by telling him she did the right thing, but that would mean that there's one person that has a genuine reason to dislike Burnham and this would hurt her perfect image and we can't have that.

EDIT: So I don't doublepost, here's an article also pointing out the flaws of the season finale:
https://www.vulture.com/article/star-tr ... art-2.html
(although the author like to go into cuckoo land)
User avatar
Asvarduil
Officer
Posts: 185
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2017 8:03 pm

Re: Star Trek Discovery: Season Three

Post by Asvarduil »

Link8909 wrote: Fri Jan 08, 2021 12:43 pmFor me personally season three is far better than Enterprises third season, simply because that season was 26 episodes of the characters being angry, bitter, and miserable, and just nonstop depression and hopelessness, Discovery has a lot more hopefulness to it and great characters that personally make me want to watch it more that Enterprise.
I agree that Discovery is more hopeful than Enterprise. However, I think Enterprise Season 3 was a better-crafted story for a few reasons.

Reason #1 - ENT S3 stuck to a concrete overall objective, while subtly working in optimistic ideals.
ENT S3 was about preventing a second Xindi attack on Earth; every action taken in the season - with the exception of North Star, mostly - was in pursuit of that objective.

Additionally, when the ENT crew did something bad, it was not heralded as a great success. It was treated with the disgust and solemnity it deserved. We didn't ever get a speech that Archer was right to commit piracy, because an Admiral's daughter is bitterly opposed to numbers.*

With that said, as the end of ENT S3 came into focus, more and more the conversations shifted from use of force to diplomacy, peace-making, and finding common ground, while protection by way of preventing harm. This appeal to optimistic ideals, even in light of the horrors of the start of the Season to me is much more hopeful than the last episodes of Science-Commando Burnham waging all-out guerilla warfare, Tilly nearly doing the same and almost suffocating despite the presence of the Burnham Advanced Fastball Special, actual Space Druids, and a evil green woman who merely got a mention that she was capable of more than just being cartoonishly evil.

In the end, even with the wackiness that was the time-traveling space nazis, ENT realized the positive ideals. Peace was brokered between United Earth and the Xindi. The Sphere Builders weren't exterminated, but sent back to their home dimension. The Andorians, despite their "help" grew closer to humanity, and even the Vulcans and humanity warmed up a little bit. Soval was genuinely concerned for Archer, and was visibly worried about him, even despite Archer being as batshit crazy as ever.

Reason #2 - ENT S3 stuck to a limited list of key plot points that were consistently observed throughout the season
Much like DISCO S3, ENT S3 also started with a serious fish-out-of-water moment: the entry into the Delphic Expanse, where the laws of physics are - in the professional terms used by astrophysicists - "totes fucked."

There were a few key points observed: the Expanse had spatial anomalies that seriously damaged any ships that entered, making it difficult to leave again. The damage to these ships led to desperate crews who had to survive by any means necessary, usually by plundering new arrivals. The Expanse was stronger near the core concentration of Spheres, and thus had worse effects there - distance led to fewer complications. The Expanse hindered subspace communications to the outside, so no one can really call for help/backup. Lastly, the Expanse and the Xindi aggression in general were architected by the Sphere Builders for their own ends.

DISCO S3 was unable to formulate such a series of points that were consistently observed.

Dilithium in the 32nd century is extremely rare because most of it detonated in The Burn, but enough exists to still power the Chain and Federation fleets. In addition to that, other transwarp technologies from centuries past still exist, but are seldom utilized. The detonation of dilithium caused the Federation to fragment for reasons relevant to each member world, but those reasons seldom have any actual impact on the story. The Chain exists as a union of Andorians and Orions who profit from the now disconnected Alpha and Beta Quadrants, but mostly take actions that exhuast the resources they're supposed to be hoarding, such as Osyraa's standing threat against Quayjon in the form of their ocean pest problem. Starfleet has become limited in reach and power, and thus more defensive in general due to limited resources (ditto for most worlds and organizations), yet can still commit massive forces to a pitched battle near Kaminar. Despite that, though, there's still starbases -sometimes with standard Federation gelato machines - that exist beyond the fringes of the limited protective bubble.

I could go on, but I frankly don't see the need to. The situation in DISCO S3 had great potential in the first episode - the list of plot points in that episode looked more like nice, focused ENT list, than the insanity at the end of the season. As more and more and more exceptions kept getting appended, it ruined the coherence of the story, and DIRECTLY led to some of the plot holes that materialized at the end of the season.

Keeping to a set of principles is good for storytelling - it limits what the heroes and villains can do, so that no challenge or solution is unbelievable. DISCO S3 created a world with a permissive set of limits, that within four episodes it had all but demolished the limits of.

Reason #3: To the ENT writers, psychology mattered. To the DISCO writers, psychology is technobabble.
You might think I'm going to start in on the Detmer PTSD arc again. However, I've said plenty on that.

The start of DISCO S3 was an interesting case study in consequences - going 900 years into the future rightly had psychological consequences. However most of these consequences that require fellowship, counseling, and possibly even psychotherapy to overcome...were mostly handled in the course of two episodes, largely offscreen, and even then transparently existed to set up Detmer's C-plot. (Side note: as bad and disrespectful as her C-plot was, it was better than all her previous C-plots, which were nothing, so...yay?)

I bring all that up to point out a contrast with ENT S3. In ENT S3, the characters falling apart in a desperate and horrifying situation was inevitable. There's only so long that people can function well in high-stress situations, and it does inflict damage on even the most ordered minds - there's a reason T'Pol was getting high on Vulcan-zombie-smack, just to feel pleasure. With that said, ENT S3's writers realized that the emotions that beings experience are both a cause of actions and challenges, and also the penalties and payoffs to those challenges.

Every time the ENT crew got a small lead to finding the Xindi base, the joy was palpable, and at least to me felt good to watch. You saw these people who really wanted to be good, optimistic and hopeful...get to be that again, like a wilted flower getting a gentle spring rain.

The DISCO writers don't understand how emotions or psychology work. As previously noted, they clearly believe that PTSD is a syonym for being "really fucking scared", which isn't the case at all. The DISCO writers don't understand that the isolation that the crew experienced isn't permanently controllable with a single ENT-worthy movie night. The DISCO writers don't understand that Burnham's background and training and even emotional makeup don't mesh with the decisions she made. The DISCO writers don't understand that Stamets shouldn't have instantly gotten over getting spaced by Michael.

I want to round this reason out with a bit of analysis. I'm being pretty technical with my "reasons" list. I have a series of points I'm trying to make. I believe this is how the DISCO writers are doing their writing, however those points lack precision, because the writers don't think things through. They know they want Tilly to be "the heart of the crew", but they don't write her other characteristics - she's good at being adorkable and smart, but little else. They know they want Michael to be "the Ace", but they don't write her other characteristics - she's good at kicking ass and being decisive, even or especially if it's a bad idea. They know they want the future to be a rough place, right up until it starts being too hard to write. Then they relax those rules, until they remember: oh right we needed that to limit what our characters can do!

Reason #4 - ENT S3 (and especially S4) were properly thought through.
While I have many of my own complaints about ENT, especially how grimdark it got at times to compete with other period programming, I rarely am able to say that anything in ENT S3 was useless (EDIT: Contrast that statement with ENT S1 and S2, which were the epitome of useless). Every episode either fleshed out a rule, set up a plot point for a future episode, expanded on a character (both villains and protagonists), revealed implications of certain rules, or improved a bond between characters. The two most useless things in ENT S3 for me were the entirety of North Star (which, was a break from the grimdark setting, and so was still indirectly useful), and the attempt to weld-up the Temporal Cold War (fucking Berman & Braga...)

DISCO S3, much like Voyager, had a few plot points that went nowhere, or just didn't really pull their weight. Dilithium should've been rare and made every ship/fleet action be carefully considered. This never applied to the heroes or the villains. Alternatives to warp existed but weren't used. Book's empathic/telepathic talents were used to bail the story out of A) the first episode, B) the Quayjon episode, and C) the writers realizing, "Oh shit we spaced the guy who can use the DASH!" His fantastic and potentially useful powers never had quite the impact on the story that, say, Adira existing had. The seed ship was a contrivance to allow the actress who left to go play Ahsoka Tano in The Mandalorian...to do just that.

DISCO S3 had a lot of story rot and waste that the viewer had to wade through to get to the point. ENT S3, despite the oppressiveness of its situations, got the viewer to the point as the first order of business, and used the details to add substance and detail to the world.
User avatar
Link8909
Captain
Posts: 579
Joined: Thu May 21, 2020 6:39 pm
Location: Kent, England
Contact:

Re: Star Trek Discovery: Season Three

Post by Link8909 »

That's honestly fair, and I do see your points.

For me why I say Discovery season three is better than Enterprise season three is definitely a personal preference on my part, and not because of the quality of the Xindi arc, and I do agree that it's a well crafted story arc with great character moments, and I think it works because they took each episode one at a time and built on each.

However for me personally the damage done in Enterprises first two seasons was too much for me to personally care what happens later on (even in season four), I simply had no interest in following Archer and his crew anymore after what I personally still consider the lowest point in Star Trek ever, back then it was first airing watching the series felt more like an obligation than an enjoyment, and it's been years since I've last gone back to re-watch it.

For me it comes down to how invested I am, and all throughout Discovery season three I was invested in the story, the characters, and the journey they were on, it definitely wasn't perfect and I do agree that there are improvements to be made, but each time a new episode was released at 8:00 AM in the morning, I was refreshing Netflix ready to watch.

I also do personally like the blend of serialized and episodic story telling in Discovery, with the overarching story-line book-ending each episode, but with a single crisis that is resolved in that episode, and all of which do have the consistent theme of connection throughout.
"I think, when one has been angry for a very long time, one gets used to it. And it becomes comfortable like…like old leather. And finally… it becomes so familiar that one can't remember feeling any other way."

- Jean-Luc Picard
Al-1701
Officer
Posts: 332
Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2020 2:51 pm

Re: Star Trek Discovery: Season Three

Post by Al-1701 »

Grey being made a hologram was odd. The Symbiotes are supposed to hold the memories of their past hosts, but it seems like Grey is a consciousness in there. I'll take it because I like Grey and this is Trek where they do things like this cuz. It also opens up an interesting opportunity for the Trill in their Symbiotes. They could use holoprojectors to manifest a past host for better interaction.

Osyraa dies by blind headshot. Too good fer um, I say. And I wonder how long Michael found herself hocking up computer core. Programmable matter is fun, but probably not all that tasty.

And turbolift shafts are, interesting. Clearly, it was a set piece for the fight and I prefer the narrow shafts of other series. Though, we got to see they do travel horizontally.

So, Book can talk to the spores as an empath. I'll take it. Though, we now know why the spore drive is not going to become common technology. With no tardigrades around, they can't make new navigators. Book's people might be able to run them, but I suspect it's only a small number with empathic abilities that could do it. Fortunately they have a big hunk of dilithium to try to find other solutions.

I wouldn't count out the Chain. It might have dissolved (likely broken apart between factions wanting to rejoin the Federation and those who do not) but a wounded animal is far more dangerous. We could see radical factions attack less like an enemy state, but an insurgency. Now, that would be a hook.
Post Reply