Areas where you'd respectfully disagree with Chuck

This forum is for discussing Chuck's videos as they are publicly released. And for bashing Neelix, but that's just repeating what I already said.
TrueMetis
Officer
Posts: 204
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2017 11:45 pm

Re: Areas where you'd respectfully disagree with Chuck

Post by TrueMetis »

Dragon Ball Fan wrote: Thu Jun 20, 2019 2:31 am they killed far more spirits then there were crew members of Equinox, they were not the many in this situation. and as I said before, they only said they had other problems, for all we know, Equinox was only in the shape she was in BECAUSE they started killing the Spirits and made them retaliate. or at least, things weren't as bad as they were letting on before that point. I mean, the first Spirit was accidentally killed during research. if their situation was that hopeless, they wouldn't have time for scientific study.
Did they? Cause as I recall one body got them like 10000 light years. So that's seven deaths to get them all the way. Been a while so I could be misremembering. I'll have to recheck the episode when I get a chance.

In any event the reason they were conducting research was the aliens gave off antimatter. Which would be pretty potentially useful for them. They weren't doing Voyager style "Hey let's look at the pretty cloud" research, but research that might actually be useful.
Dragon Ball Fan
Captain
Posts: 3160
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 10:40 pm

Re: Areas where you'd respectfully disagree with Chuck

Post by Dragon Ball Fan »

TrueMetis wrote: Thu Jun 20, 2019 2:09 pm
Dragon Ball Fan wrote: Thu Jun 20, 2019 2:31 am they killed far more spirits then there were crew members of Equinox, they were not the many in this situation. and as I said before, they only said they had other problems, for all we know, Equinox was only in the shape she was in BECAUSE they started killing the Spirits and made them retaliate. or at least, things weren't as bad as they were letting on before that point. I mean, the first Spirit was accidentally killed during research. if their situation was that hopeless, they wouldn't have time for scientific study.
Did they? Cause as I recall one body got them like 10000 light years. So that's seven deaths to get them all the way. Been a while so I could be misremembering. I'll have to recheck the episode when I get a chance.

In any event the reason they were conducting research was the aliens gave off antimatter. Which would be pretty potentially useful for them. They weren't doing Voyager style "Hey let's look at the pretty cloud" research, but research that might actually be useful.
even if you're right, saving only 47 people does not justify what they did, it's different then what Sisko did or even what Spock did, in the latter, it was a matter of imminate death, not potential death.
User avatar
Deledrius
Captain
Posts: 1965
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 3:24 pm

Re: Areas where you'd respectfully disagree with Chuck

Post by Deledrius »

Replace nucleogenic lifeforms with Vulcans.

The Equinox crew discovers that they can kill a Vulcan against its will to gain 1k LY toward home. So they murder seven unwilling Vulcans.

The utilitarian argument may be made (seven lives against forty seven). But this is clearly 100% outside of the moral and ethical guidelines demonstrated and espoused by the Federation and its members.
User avatar
Admiral X
Captain
Posts: 2654
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2017 4:37 am

Re: Areas where you'd respectfully disagree with Chuck

Post by Admiral X »

Yeah, I just think Janeway went way too overboard on it. Pretty sure the Federation wouldn't go for what she did to that one crewman by threatening to give him to the aliens unless he talked and then actually carrying out the threat. And then the way she gave the aliens the Equinox the way she did.
"Black care rarely sits behind a rider whose pace is fast enough."
-TR
User avatar
Yukaphile
Overlord
Posts: 8778
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2017 8:14 am
Location: Rabid Posting World
Contact:

Re: Areas where you'd respectfully disagree with Chuck

Post by Yukaphile »

One area I disagree with is that Bester looks out for his own kind. I mean, this may just be JMS' "trap-door approach" fouling things up with his original vision, since we know that Takashima was meant to be the Manchurian Candidate and not Talia, but regardless, as presented, you cannot claim the Psi Corps look out for their own when you effectively "death of personality" a member of your own organization. That's treated as the same as regular death, the person you were is wiped away and thus destroyed, replaced by another that is not you, and in this case, completely antithetical to everything Talia is and was.
"A culture's teachings - and more importantly, the nature of its people - achieve definition in conflict. They find themselves, or find themselves lacking."
— Kreia, Knights of the Old Republic 2: The Sith Lords
User avatar
Nealithi
Captain
Posts: 1427
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2018 11:41 pm
Location: New Jersey

Re: Areas where you'd respectfully disagree with Chuck

Post by Nealithi »

Yukaphile wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2019 5:47 am One area I disagree with is that Bester looks out for his own kind. I mean, this may just be JMS' "trap-door approach" fouling things up with his original vision, since we know that Takashima was meant to be the Manchurian Candidate and not Talia, but regardless, as presented, you cannot claim the Psi Corps look out for their own when you effectively "death of personality" a member of your own organization. That's treated as the same as regular death, the person you were is wiped away and thus destroyed, replaced by another that is not you, and in this case, completely antithetical to everything Talia is and was.
Was Bester ever mentioned as being in on that though? If not it would be like blaming Sheridan for things Earth Force did wrong, and was not part of.
Darth Wedgius
Captain
Posts: 2948
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2017 7:43 pm

Re: Areas where you'd respectfully disagree with Chuck

Post by Darth Wedgius »

Deledrius wrote: Thu Jun 20, 2019 11:37 pm Replace nucleogenic lifeforms with Vulcans.

The Equinox crew discovers that they can kill a Vulcan against its will to gain 1k LY toward home. So they murder seven unwilling Vulcans.

The utilitarian argument may be made (seven lives against forty seven). But this is clearly 100% outside of the moral and ethical guidelines demonstrated and espoused by the Federation and its members.
Hmmm... Are these TOS/TNG Vulcans or more like the post-TNG Vulcans who aren't Tuvok?
User avatar
Deledrius
Captain
Posts: 1965
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 3:24 pm

Re: Areas where you'd respectfully disagree with Chuck

Post by Deledrius »

Admiral X wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2019 4:35 am Yeah, I just think Janeway went way too overboard on it. Pretty sure the Federation wouldn't go for what she did to that one crewman by threatening to give him to the aliens unless he talked and then actually carrying out the threat. And then the way she gave the aliens the Equinox the way she did.
Absolutely. This, if nothing else, should have seen her face a serious Court Martial upon returning home. Torturing a fellow officer for information and leaving them to die (he would have been killed if not saved by Chakotay) is beyond reason for a Starfleet Captain.
Yukaphile wrote: Fri Jun 21, 2019 5:47 am One area I disagree with is that Bester looks out for his own kind.
Easy. Talia was no longer of Bester's kind. One thing we see about Bester is that he has a very black & white tribalism regarding everyone, including teeps. If you're in any way a traitor or collaborator, you cease being part of the family and become an asset to be used the same as any other human or alien.
Dragon Ball Fan
Captain
Posts: 3160
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 10:40 pm

Re: Areas where you'd respectfully disagree with Chuck

Post by Dragon Ball Fan »

wile still reckless, I still maintain Janeway never intended for that Equinox crew member to be in any actual danger, she just overestimated her ability to chase the spirit off before it killed him.
User avatar
Yukaphile
Overlord
Posts: 8778
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2017 8:14 am
Location: Rabid Posting World
Contact:

Re: Areas where you'd respectfully disagree with Chuck

Post by Yukaphile »

@Deledrius The thing with Talia is that despite her conflicts, she was still loyal - at least until Season 2. Anything less is headcanon.
"A culture's teachings - and more importantly, the nature of its people - achieve definition in conflict. They find themselves, or find themselves lacking."
— Kreia, Knights of the Old Republic 2: The Sith Lords
Post Reply